Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harikeshao Shriiram Gadhwe vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
2003 Latest Caselaw 790 Bom

Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 790 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2003

Bombay High Court
Harikeshao Shriiram Gadhwe vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 14 July, 2003
Equivalent citations: 2004 CriLJ 170
Author: R Mohite
Bench: R Mohite

ORDER

R.S. Mohite, J.

1. Heard Shri Jaiswal, learned advocate for the petitioner and Shri Patel, learned APP for the respondents.

2. Rule. By consent of the parties, rule is made returnable forthwith.

3. This is an application made by the petitioner for grant of parole. It appears that the applicant had applied for parole on 1-1-2003. Parole had been sought on the ground of his son's illness. The record indicates that on 20-1-2003, the police report was submitted by the Superintendent of Police. Yavatmal to the Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, confirming that son of the petitioner was not well and further that one Mandabai Gokulrao Lawre was ready to stand his surety. Similar is the report of the District Collector dated 3-3-2003. The medical certificate pertaining to the son of the petitioner is the part of the record available with the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and it indicates that son of the petitioner is suffering from P.V.O. and enteric fever.

4. A perusal of the order dated 24-3-2003, however, indicates that the parole application of the petitioner is rejected completely on different ground that is to say that the petitioner has the habit of surrendering late and that there is a case which is pending against the present petitioner.

5. Insofar as the case pending against the petitioner is concerned, there is no mention of any pending case in the affidavit in reply. As far as the ground of overstanding is concerned, that is a ground which will be applicable for release on furlough under Rule 4(10) of the Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, if the petitioner was required to be arrested. However, in my view, that cannot be a ground for rejecting the parole which is sought on the ground of illness of the son of the petitioner under Rule 19 of the Rules.

6. In this view of the matter, it is directed that the petitioner be released on parole for a period of 30 days from the date of his release, in accordance with rules. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter