Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bandaru Mrudula Alias Billakurthi ... vs The State Of Ap
2024 Latest Caselaw 8953 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8953 AP
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Bandaru Mrudula Alias Billakurthi ... vs The State Of Ap on 26 September, 2024

APHC010415372024

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                  AT AMARAVATI                                  [3396]
                           (Special Original Jurisdiction)

          THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
                TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                                     PRESENT

 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

                        WRIT PETITION NO: 21395/2024

Between:

Bandaru Mrudula Alias Billakurthi Mrudula                              ...PETITIONER

                                         AND

The State Of Ap and Others                                       ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. GOWRI SANKAR CHEEKATLA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following order:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

seeking the indulgence of the Court with the following prayer:

"...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declare the action of Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 especially respondent No.4 & 5 in not registering the FIR against the respondents 6 to 11 on the complaint dated 14.09.2024 given by the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and also violation of principles of natural justice and also volatile of Article 14, 19 and 21 and of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 and 5 to register the FIR basing on the complaint of the petitioner

dated 14.09.2024 and taken appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 11 in accordance with law and pass such... ".

2. Heard Sri Cheekatla Gowri Shankar, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home takes notice for official

Respondents/State.

3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner lodged a complaint

against the Respondent Nos.6 to 11 alleging that they subjected the

complainant to cruelty. Hence, the Petitioner made a complaint to the Police

on 14.09.2024. Inspite of the same, they have not registered the case against

the unofficial Respondents.

4. In short, the prayer sought in this W.P. is being aggrieved by non-

registration of FIR. The law on the point of maintainability of a writ petition

seeking direction to register an FIR is settled. This Court in Kaja Rama Rao

v. State of A.P., and others1, while reiterating the position of law in Sri

Chegireddy Venkata Reddy v. Government of Andhra Pradesh2, Nagisetti

Kodanda Ramaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh,3 A. Venkata Narasu Babu

v. State of Andhra Pradesh,4 and K.V. Bhaskar v. State of Andhra

Pradesh and others5, has held as follows;

"35. It is an absolutely settled legal position that vide Section 154(1), it is the bounden duty of the police official and upon failure, the remedies, vide Sections 154(3), 156(3), 190, 200, come into

2024 (1) ALT (Cri.)(A.P) 54 ( S.B. )

2020 (5) ALT 24

2023 SCC OnLine AP 3141

(2020) Supreme (AP) 510

(2023) 1 AmLJ 117

rescue of the informant. Because of these readily engrafted provisions, writ remedy cannot be exercised in a routine or casual manner. Thus, it is safe to conclude that the writ of mandamus can be declined when it is sought to direct registration of FIR, before/without exhausting the available statutory remedies.

However, being an extraordinary jurisdiction, this Court may exercise its jurisdiction in special and grave situations, which are exceptional in nature depending on the facts and circumstances of the case."

5. In the light of the judgments referred supra, this question does not

require any fresh consideration. In the light of the same, this Writ Petition is

disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioner to work-out her remedies as per

law, by filing a complaint before the learned Magistrate Court, in case, the

Police have failed to register the case.

6. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to

costs.

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date : 26.09.2024 PSA

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Writ Petition No.21395 of 2024

Dt.26.09.2024

PSA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter