Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9487 AP
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2024
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.608 of 2024
PROCEEDING SHEET
S. OFFICE
Date ORDER
No NOTE
05 19.10.2024
SRS,J
Heard.
Admit.
The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration:
1) Whether the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration and injunction is maintainable in view of judgment in Executive Officer, Sri Bramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Temple, Beeramguda Vs. Saikrupa Homes [2010(6) ALD 207] and P.Jaggayya alias Jagga Rao and another Vs. The Diety of Seetharama Swamy Varu also known as Sriramulu Vari Temple, Komaragiripatnam & others [1987 (1) ALT 18]?
2) Whether the judgment of the appellate Court suffers from failure to frame points for consideration as mentioned in Rule 1 of Order XXXI of CPC?
___________ SRS, J PVD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!