Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Sri Chandra Industries, ... vs Dy.Commr. Ct Fac, Guntur 2 Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 9387 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9387 AP
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

M/S. Sri Chandra Industries, ... vs Dy.Commr. Ct Fac, Guntur 2 Others on 16 October, 2024

Author: R Raghunandan Rao

Bench: R Raghunandan Rao

 APHC010375752008

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                    AT AMARAVATI                           [3488]
                             (Special Original Jurisdiction)

              WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
                  TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
                                   PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
                THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
                         WRIT PETITION NO: 9846/2008
Between:
M/s. Sri Chandra Industries, Piduguralla.                         ...PETITIONER
                                      AND
Dy Commr Ct Fac Guntur 2 Others and Others                   ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M V J K KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

2. SURIBABU S(SPL SC FOR CT AP)

The Court made the following Order: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

The petitioner, who was registered as a dealer under the Andhra

Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 and was engaged in the business of

sale of coal and cem powder. The assessment for the year, 1997-1998, was

completed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Piduguralla, by an order, dated

11.11.1998. This order was subjected to revision by the Deputy

Commissioner, dated 19.06.2000.

2. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an Appeal before the

Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal by way of T.A.No.662 of 2003.

RRR,J & HN,J

3. The issue in the Appeal was the categorization of cem powder and

whether the cem powder would fall within the definition of dyes & chemicals or

it should be treated as an unclassified item.

4. As various other dealers dealing with similar products had filed a

number of Appeals, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal took up all the

connected Appeals and passed a common order, dated 21.11.2001. In this

order, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal following its earlier judgment had held

that, cem powder would not fall within the ambit of dyes & chemicals and

should be treated as an unclassified item.

5. Though the Appeal of the petitioner was in relation to this issue, it was

inadvertently attached to another batch of Appeals, which were on the

question of the rate of tax to be paid on purchase of coal from M/s. Singareni

Collieries. This batch of cases was disposed of by the Tribunal by an order,

dated 28.09.2004.

6. The petitioner being aggrieved by the inadvertent attachment of the

Appeal to an unrelated batch of cases and the result of the said batch of

Appeals has approached this Court by way of the present Writ Petition.

7. A perusal of the material placed before this Court including the

judgments of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, dated 21.11.2001 in the batch

connected to categorization of cem powder and the judgment of the Tribunal,

dated 28.09.2004, relating to the question of rate of tax on purchase of coal

from M/s.Singareni Collieries, it is evident that the Appeal of the petitioner was

RRR,J & HN,J

attached to an unrelated batch and the judgment of the said batch would not

be applicable to the petitioner.

8. Conversely, the result of the batch of cases disposed of by the order,

dated 21.11.2001, would be applicable to the petitioner.

9. It also appears that, the Tax Revision Cases filed against the judgment

by the Tribunal, dated 21.11.2001, had been dismissed, as can be seen from

the judgment of a Hon'ble Division Bench of the erstwhile High Court of

Andhra Pradesh, dated 24.07.2003 in T.R.C.No.171 of 2002 & batch.

10. In these circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of by holding that

the cem powder sold by the petitioner for the assessment year, 1997-1998,

shall be treated as un-categorized goods and shall not be taken to the "dyes &

chemicals"

11. Accordingly, the assessment order is confirmed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed.

________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

______________ HARINATH.N, J

Date:16.10.2024 KPV

RRR,J & HN,J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO:9846 of 2008 (per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

16.10.2024

KPV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter