Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Triplaar School Of Learning vs M/S. Kalyani Ads
2024 Latest Caselaw 10184 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10184 AP
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

M/S. Triplaar School Of Learning vs M/S. Kalyani Ads on 12 November, 2024

Author: R. Raghunandan Rao

Bench: R Raghunandan Rao

 APHC010474962023
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATI                                 [3508]
                            (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
                   TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
                                      PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
    THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
                        WRIT PETITION NO: 24556/2023
Between:
M/s. Triplaar School Of Learning and Others                             ...PETITIONER(S)
                                    AND
M/s Kalyani Ads and Others                                           ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
   1. KINTALI DHARMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
   1. S. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY (SC FOR APSLSA)
   2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM
The Court made the following Order: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
             The respondents 1 & 2 herein had sought recovery of certain

sums of money from the petitioners herein, on the ground that they had

carried out advertisements on behalf of the 1st petitioner and had not been

paid the charges for such advertisements.


       2.     The matter was referred to the Lok-Adalat at District Level,

Guntur as a Pre-Litigation Case. The reference was numbered as

P.L.C.No.153 of 2010. In the said P.L.C, the petitioners as well as the

respondents 1 & 2 have filed terms of compromise, on 02.09.2010. The Lok-

Adalat at District Level, Guntur, had recorded the same and had issued an

Award dated 02.09.2010.
                                                 2

           3.       Thereafter, the respondents 1 & 2 are said to have filed

E.P.No.393 of 2017 before the learned II Additional District Judge, Guntur.


           4.      During the pendency of the said Execution Petition, the

petitioners have moved the present Writ Petition challenging the Award dated

02.09.2010 passed in P.L.C.No.153 of 2010 on the Lok-Adalat at District Level

Guntur.


           5.      Sri V. Venugopal Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing on

behalf of Sri Kintali Dharama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners would

submit that Section-20 of the Legal Service Authority Act, 1987 read with the

Regulations           of    the   National   Legal   Services   Authority   (Lok-Adalats)

Regulations, 2009 requires certain formalities to be complied with. He would

submit that non-compliance of these mandatory regulations would render the

award void and non-est.

           6.      The Learned Senior Counsel would draw the attention of this

Court to the Regulation No.17 and the Judgment of a Division Bench of this

Court in the case of Yalamarthi Narasimha Rao Vs. District Legal Services

Authority (Lok-Adalath) at Vijayawada, Krishna District & Ors1. On the basis of

the aforesaid Regulation and the Judgment, the Learned Senior Counsel

would argue that every Award of the Lok-Adalat requires the signature or

affixed thumb impression by the parties to the Award as well as the

countersignatures of the Members of the Lok-Adalat, any failure with this

requirements would rendered the Award as void and non-est.

1
    2022 (1) ALD 547 (AP) (DB)
                                         3

      7.       Learned Senior Counsel relying upon the certified copies of the

Award dated 02.09.2010 would contend that the said Order does not appear

to contain of signatures of the parties or the Members of the Lok-Adalat.


      8.       Sri Ramachandra Rao Gurram, learned counsel for the

respondents 1 & 2 would contend that the actual Award in question, the terms

of compromise and the consequent Award passed on the said terms of

compromise, contained at Pages 22 to 25 would show that the both terms of

compromise as well as the award has been signed by the parties and

countersigned by the Presiding Officer of the Lok-Adalat.


      9.       A perusal of these pages would show that the signatures of the

parties as well as the Members of the Lok-Adalat are available both terms of

compromise as well as the Award.

      10.      In the circumstances, this Court must hold that the Judgment

cited by the Learned Senior Counsel and as well as Regulation No.17 of the

Andhra Pradesh State Legal Services Authority, 1996 would not have any

application.

      11.      Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no

order as to costs.

      As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.


                                                  ________________________
                                                  R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.

______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J BSM

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

W.P. No.24556 OF 2023 (per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

Date: 12.11.2024

BSM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter