Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4659 AP
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
APHC010638572023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3462]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
SECOND APPEAL NO: 4/2024
Between:
Yarasi Vijaya Kumar ...APPELLANT
AND
Billigunta Venkata Ramana ...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
The Court made the following:
Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant.
The following substantial questions of law arose for consideration in
the instant Second Appeal.
1) Whether the Courts below were right in holding that the cause of action
arose within the jurisdiction of the Gurazala Court despite the admitted
fact that the document was executed within the limits of Vijayawada?
2) Whether the Courts below have failed in appreciating the repayments
effected by the Appellant/Defendant? And for such other substantial
questions that may arise for consideration, ADMIT.
Notice.
I.A.No.1 of 2023
Head learned Counsel for the Appellant.
This application is preferred praying to grant stay of the judgment and
decree, dated 11.02.2021.
Perused the grounds urged in support of the Application and in the light of
the substantial questions of law framed by this Court, it is just and equitable to
stay coercive action against the Appellant.
In that view of the matter, this Interlocutory Application is allowed subject
to the Appellant depositing a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs and
Fifty Thousand only) before the trial Court, within a period of six weeks from
today.
_____
GN,J.
cs/anr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!