Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Chenchamma vs R.Subramanyadm Raju 5 Other
2024 Latest Caselaw 4607 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4607 AP
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

R.Chenchamma vs R.Subramanyadm Raju 5 Other on 21 June, 2024

APHC010074022003
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATI                  [3397]
                            (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE
                     TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                                PRESENT

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA
                       KRISHNA RAO

                        FIRST APPEAL NO: 3363/2003

Between:

  1. R.CHENCHAMMA, W/O. CHENGALRAJU CULTIVATION R/O.
     SIDDIRAJU KANDRIGA VILLAGE & POST PITCHATUR (M)
     CHITTOOR DT.

                                                         ...APPELLANT

                                   AND

  1. R SUBRAMANYADM RAJU        5 OTHER, S/O. RAMA RAJU
     CULTIVATION R/O. SIDDIRAJU KANDRIGA VILLAGE PITCHATUR
     (M) CHITTOOR DT.

  2. R GAJENDRA RAJU, S/O. RAMARAJU BUSINESS C/O. A.S.SHAIK
     CIRCAR NAGAR, MUL ROAD, CHANDRAPUR MAHARASTRA.

  3. R BHASKAR RAJU, S/O. RAMA RAJU CULTIVATION R/O.
     SIDDIRAJU KANDRIGA VILLAGE PITCHATUR (M) CHITTOOR DT.

  4. K BAGYAMMA, W/O. BHISHMA RAJU R/O. APLAVARAM (V)
     ARASURU POST PONNERI TALUK

  5. R CHILAKAMMA, W/O. RAMA RAJU R/O. P.V. PURAM VILLAGE &
     POST SATYAVEDU (M) CHITTOOR DT.

  6. C BAJA RAJI, S/O KANNAIAHRAJU @ VENKATA RAJU
     CULTIVATION R/O. SIDDIRAJU KANDRIGA VILLAGE PITCHATUR
     (M) CHITTOOR DT.

                                                     ...RESPONDENT(S):
      Appeal against the Judgment and decree dt.9.1.2003 made in OS No.24
of 2000 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, Chittoor dt.

IA NO: 1 OF 2003(CMP 23125 OF 2003

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
stay all further proceedings fincluding passing of the final decree in view of the
judgment and prelimanary decree passed by the Senior Csivil Judge,
Srikalahasti Chittoor Dt. in OS No.24 of 2000, dt.9-1-2003, pending disposal of
AS No.3363          of 2003 and to pass such other sdorder or sdorders as this
Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper sin the circumstances of the case

IA NO: 2 OF 2003(CMP 23126 OF 2003

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
injunct the respondents/ defendants herein from csreating any third party
interest in the plaint schedule properties in OS No.24 of 2000 on the file of the
Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi Chittoor District Pending disposal of AS
No.3363 of 2003 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court
may deem fit and proper din the csircumstances of the case

IA NO: 1 OF 2011(ASMP 611 OF 2011

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
bring the petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 herein as L.Rs of the deceased 1st
petitioner/Respondent No.2 as party Respondent Nos. 7 to 9 in the above
appeal proceedings in the interest of justice and to pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2011(ASMP 1054 OF 2011

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
condone the delay of 75 days in filing the L.R. Petition in the interest of justice

IA NO: 3 OF 2011(ASMP 1055 OF 2011

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
set aside the abatement of the appeal in view non-filing of the L.R.Petition
within time, in the interest of justice

Counsel for the Appellant:
      1. J UGRANARASIMHA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

     1. N PRAMOD

     2. K MOHAN RAMI REDDY

The Court made the following:

JUDGMENT:

1. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.05.2024, learned

counsel for the appellant represented that the sole appellant died during the

pendency of the appeal and he requested time for taking further steps to bring

the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant on record.

2. Today when the matter is called for hearing, there is no representation

on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents is alone

present.

3. Since the sole appellant is no more, the appeal stands abated.

Therefore, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as

to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

Date.21.06.2024.

CVD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter