Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1251 AP
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ::
AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[
3463
]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
APHC010197342023 TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT APPEAL NO: 475 OF 2023
Between:
THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LTD
AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S)
AND
S SURYANARAYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
The Court made the following Judgment:
1) Heard learned Counsel for the Appellants and the
learned Counsel for the Respondents.
2) The Intra-Court Appeal is directed against the following
directions issued by the learned Single Judge.
"10. Assailing the said order, an Appeal was preferred in Writ Appeal Nos. 110 of 2014 and batch, and Division Bench of erstwhile High Court of A.P. disposed of the Appeal on 03.06.2014 with certain observations. Following
the said order, this Court is also inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions:
a) The restriction of marks for weightage for the service candidates to 20%.
b) The contract labour, who are otherwise eligible to apply, shall be awarded one mark for each completed block of six months of service subject to maximum of 20%.
c) A fresh written test shall be conducted by the respective Discoms for the respective posts for „80‟ marks, by informing all the applicants at least four (04) weeks in advance before conducting of the examinations.
d) the entire process shall be completed within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs."
3) Primarily, we are of the considered view that the learned
Single Judge could not have issued the directions of this
nature, in view of the short fact that all the
Petitioners/Private Respondents have gone well past the age
of 50 years and the question of issuing directions to employ
such aged bar persons is unsustainable. That apart, the
process of selection is the prerogative of the employer and the
method and process of selection cannot be dictated by the
Courts and the process of selection has to be left to the hands
of the experts or ought to be in accordance with the cadre and
recruitment rules or policies framed by the competent
authorities.
4) The reliance placed by the learned Single Judge on the
orders' of the Coordinate Bench, in our considered opinion,
was not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case.
5) Admittedly, even as per the learned Single Judge, the
Petitioners were rendering services as contract labourers and
their engagement with the Appellants Corporation ended in
2001. Despite these stark & revealing facts, the learned
Single Judge has deemed it necessary to issue directions,
which in our considered opinion is wholly unsustainable.
6) Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is allowed. Order of the
learned Single Judge is set-aside. Writ Petition stands
dismissed. No order as to costs.
7) As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
shall stand closed.
________________ G.NARENDAR, J
_____________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Sm../...
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!