Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Between vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 6896 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6896 AP
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Between vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 8 August, 2024

 APHC010136172021
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                    AT AMARAVATI                                    [3310]
                             (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                    THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST
                      TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
                                         PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
                           WRIT PETITION NO: 7776/2021
Between:
M. Bhavani                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                                            AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others                                ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for

the following relief:-

"...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent Authorities in not absorption/regularization a th petitioner' services as Zoology lecturer in aided vacancy as per the Common Judgment passed in W.A.No.263 of 2019 and batch dated 31.07.2020 and not extending the similar benefit of G.O.Ms.No.12, Higher Education (CE-A2) Department, dt.10.03.2021 to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unconstitutional and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to absorb/regularisation of the petitioner's service in grant in aid post by extending the similar benefit of G.O.Ms.No.12, Higher Education (CE-A2) Department, dated 10.03.2021 and the Common judgment

passed in W.A.No.263 of 2019 and batch, dt.31.07.2020 and with all consequential benefits by considering the particulars of the petitioner submitted by the 4th respondent college on 30.12.2018...."

2. Heard Sri K.Satynarayana Murthy, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education,

appearing for the respondents.

3. On hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter

is squarely covered by an order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11766 of

2021, dated 12.07.2024, and hence, requests this Court to pass similar order

in this petition also. The operative portion of the said order is as follows:

"Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed, while directing the respondents to absorb the petitioners in the clear sanctioned grant-in-aid posts with all consequential benefits as per rules existed, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs."

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents submits that respondent Nos.1 to 3 have filed counter affidavit

denying all the allegations made in the petition. She further submits that the

Management of the 4th respondent-college has appointed the petitioner purely

on temporary/part time basis on a consolidated pay without any paper

notification and without following any selection procedure and without any duly

constituted selection committee, without notifying the vacancies to the

employment exchange, without having clear sanctioned aided vacancies and

without possessing minimum requisite qualifications at the time of

appointment. The salaries are being paid by the Management funds and

further, neither permission was accorded by the government for their

appointment nor salaries were paid by the government. Hence, the question of

absorption does not arise in respect of service of the petitioner. Therefore,

learned Assistant Government Pleader vehemently opposed to allow the writ

petition and prays to dismiss the same.

5. On hearing the submissions of both the learned counsels and upon

perusing the entire material available on record, this Court deems fit to allow

the present writ petition in terms of the above said order.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the order dated

12.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11766 of 2021. There shall be no

order as to costs.

7. The Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order passed in

W.P.No.11766 of 2021, dated 12.07.2024 to this order.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

closed.

__________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J BMS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter