Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M Siva Ram Babu vs Shashi Bhushan Kumar,I.A.S
2023 Latest Caselaw 4729 AP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4729 AP
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2023

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
M Siva Ram Babu vs Shashi Bhushan Kumar,I.A.S on 6 October, 2023
        THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO

                  CONTEMPT CASE No.3449 OF 2023

ORDER:

This Contempt case has been filed to punish the

contemnors/respondents under the provisions of Contempt of

courts Act 1971 for violation of the orders and for not

implementing the orders of this Court in W.P.(AT) No.373 of

2021 dated 19.01.2023.

2. Heard Sri C. Srinivasa Baba, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and Sri V. K. Naidu, learned

Government Pleader for Services-III appearing for the

respondents.

3. This Court, vide order, dated 19.01.2023, in W.P. (AT)

No.373 of 2021, has disposed of the writ petition. The operative

portion of the said order, reads as under:

".........,...directing the respondents to consider the case ofhte petitioner and accord and pay the SPP Grade I and II Scales from the date of his acquiring requisite qualification in the year 2006 and also revise his pension as per his entitlement. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, even

though this Court gave a direction to the respondents to

consider the claim of the petitioner and accordingly to pay SPP

Grade-I and II Scales from the date of his acquiring requisite

qualification in the year 2005 and also revise the pension as per

his entitlement. He further submits that this Court specifically

directed that the exercise shall be completed within a period of

eight weeks. He submits that the respondents are duty bound

to implement the same by March 2023. But the respondents

neither implementing the orders of this Court nor responding to

the representations made by the petitioner. hence, the

respondents deliberately, wilfully disobeying the orders of this

court, which amounts to contempt. Hence, learned counsel

prayed to pass appropriate orders.

5. Per contra, learned Government Pleader appearing for

the respondents submits that in pursuance of the orders of this

Court dated 15.02.2023, the Superintending Engineer, W.R.

Department, Irrigation Circle, Visakhapatnam i.e.,. 3rd

respondent, has issued speaking orders, wherein it was

mentioned in para-12 and 15, reads as under:

"12. "The Hon'ble High Court of A.P., Amaravathi vide its judgment in W.P (AT) No.373 of 2021 received on 15.02.2023, "directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and accord and pay the SPP Grade I Scales from the date of his acquiring requisite qualification in the year 2006 and also revise his pension as per his entitlement. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order."

15. In view of the above judgment i.e., the Hon'ble APAT, Hyderabad in R.P.No.5819/89 vide judgment dated 19.10.1995 and W.P.(AT) No.373 of 2021 since Sri M.Sivaram Babu has failed to acquire the requisite qualification within the stipulated time or as per the Hon'ble APAT judgment order dated 19.10.1995 in R.P.No.5819/89 cited, it is not feasible to consider the post of U.D Steno and consequently for Automatic Advancement Scheme and its benefits. Therefore, his request could not be considered as per Hon'ble Court judgment."

6. Learned Government Pleader while reiterating the

contents made in the above speaking order, submits that the

respondents have complied with the orders of this Court and

hence requests this Court the contempt case may be closed.

7. In view of the above, this Court observed that the

orders of this Court dated 15.02.2023 passed in W.P.(AT)

No.373 of 2021 has already been complied with by the

respondent authorities herein. Hence, no orders are required to

be passed in the present contempt case and the same is liable to

be closed.

8. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as

to costs. If at all any grievance, the petitioner is at liberty to

avail the remedy available to him under law.

9. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications

shall stand closed.

______________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.

Date :     6 -10-2023

Gvl





      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO




           CONTEMPT CASE No.3449 of 2023




                  Date :   6 .10.2022




Gvl


 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter