Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Special Deputy Collector vs Dr. C. Anjanappa
2023 Latest Caselaw 1355 AP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1355 AP
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2023

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
The Special Deputy Collector vs Dr. C. Anjanappa on 10 March, 2023
            THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO

      THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO

                        L.A.A.S.No.1153 of 2011

JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.Ganga Rao)


      The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), HNSS Unit-

IV, Kurnool, Kurnool District preferred this appeal being aggrieved

by the award passed by the Reference Court in L.A.O.P.No.24 of

2007 for the grounds raised in Memorandum of appeal, as being

illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the evidence available on record.


2.    The appellant - Land Acquisition Officer/Special Deputy

Collector (Land Acquisition) had acquired the land extent Ac.51.00

in Sy.Nos.223/1 and 224/1 of B.Thandrapadu Village, on

requisition from the Executive Engineer, HNSS Division, Kurnool

for   excavation   of   HNSC    Main   canal   from   K.M.28.300   to

K.M.30.900 by invoking urgency clause under Section 17(4) of the

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') for early handing

over the lands for taking up the work. A draft notification under

Section 4(1) of the Act and a draft declaration under Section 6 of

the   Act   were   given for   publishing   in A.P.   Gazette   Part-I

Extraordinary and in newspapers. Since invoking urgency clause,

the enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act has been dispensed with.
                                    2



The Land Acquisition Officer, after survey and enquiry, categorized

the lands as Category-1(a) and Category-1(b), passed the Award

No.30/2006-07 dated 20.11.2006 and fixed the market value @

Rs.65,000/- per acre to Category-1(a) dry lands irrigated with rain

fed water and Rs.75,000/- to Category-1(b) irrigated lands by bore

wells and pipelines.   The respondent received the compensation

under protest and sought reference under Section 18 of the Act to

the Civil Court. The Reference Court received the land acquisition

award for adjudication under Section 18 of the Act for

determination of the true market value of the acquired land for

fixing the just compensation. The respondent/claimant filed claim

petition stating that the acquired lands are fertile lands and raised

commercial crops therein. The area where the lands were

acquired was already developed for residential plots and

educational institutions and for other establishments. The earlier

sale transactions are not taken into consideration by the Land

Acquisition Officer and the acquired lands are situated nearby the

Municipal Corporation area and there is a rapid growth in that

area. There are several educational institutions like Kesava Reddy

High School, Safa Engineer College, Pulla Reddy Engineering

College, Dental College, etc. and other resorts are also situated

nearby the lands acquired by the appellant and each acre is worth

about Rs.20 lakhs to Rs.25 lakhs. However, the Land Acquisition

Officer fixed the meager amount and thereby caused irreparable

loss to the claimant.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition would

contend that the Land Acquisition Officer after taking possession

of the acquired lands, surveyed the lands and personally

inspected them along with Special Deputy Tahsildar, Special

Surveyor and Special Revenue Inspector on 08.04.2006. All the

lands are registered as 'dry' as per Re-settlement Register. For

determination of market value, the entire acquired land is

categorized as Category-1(a) - dry lands irrigated with rain fed

water and Category-1(b) - dry lands irrigated by bore wells

through pipe lines. The Land Acquisition Officer considered

nearly 259 sale transactions from Sub-Registrar, Kurnool pertain

to preceding three years from last date of publication of

notification i.e., from 27.05.2003 to 27.05.2006 and finally fixed

the market value at Rs.65,000/- per acre for dry lands in

Category-1(a) and Rs.75,000/- per acre for dry lands in Category-

1(b) and also passed award on 20.11.2006 in Award No.30/2006-

2007, granting 30% solatium, additional market value, etc. The

award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer reflects the details of

the land and enquiry conducted by him while fixing the

compensation by taking into consideration the parameters fixed

under the provisions of Section 23 of the Act. The Reference

Court grossly erred in enhancing the compensation from

Rs.65,000/- per acre to Rs.1,50,000/- per acre.

4. Sri K.Rathangapani Reddy, learned counsel appearing for

the respondent-claimant, would contend that the acquired lands

are situated near Kurnool Municipal Corporation and the lands

are having potential for rapid growth as there are several

educational institutions like Kesava Reddy High School, Safa

Engineer College, Pulla Reddy Engineering College, Dental College,

etc. and other resorts are also situated in that area and each acre

is worth about Rs.25 lakhs to Rs.30 lakhs. The Land Acquisition

Officer, while discarding the sale transactions and the evidence

placed before him, granted meager compensation of Rs.65,000/-

per acre to dry land and Rs.75,000/- to irrigated lands through

bore wells. The Reference Court rightly enhanced the

compensation by taking into consideration the oral and

documentary evidence and on elaborate discussion and also by

considering the sale item No.168 - dry land in Sy.No.266/1A vide

sale document No.6855 dated 12.05.2022 for an amount of

Rs.79,054/- per acre which is the highest single sale, which does

not warrant any interference of this Court.

5. This Court, having considered the facts and circumstances

of the case, submissions of the learned counsel and on perusal of

the record, found that the Reference Court having considered the

nature of lands categorized into two categories as Category-1 and

Category-2 and fixed the market value of the lands. The lands

were acquired for excavation of HNSS Main canal from K.M.28.300

to K.M.30.900 for an extent of Ac.51.00 in Sy.Nos.223/1 and

224/1 of B.Thandrapadu Village. The Land Acquisition Officer

has to fix the compensation to the acquired lands as per the

provisions of Section 23 of the Act and as per the principles laid

down by this Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court.

6. The Land Acquisition Officer having obtained 259 sale

transactions from Sub-Registrar's Office, Kurnool which took

place preceding three years from the date of publication of

notification but almost all the sale transactions were discarded

without assigning any reasons and granted compensation of

Rs.65,000/- per acre for dry lands irrigated with rain fed water

and Rs.75,000/- per acre for dry lands irrigated by bore wells

through pipe lines. The sale deed pertains to Sy.No.15 in S.No.5

of B.Thandrapadu Village shows that the rate of Ac.1.00 is

Rs.2,90,523/-; in S.No.25 the value is Rs.2,90,523/-; in S.No.60

the rate per acre is Rs.2,91,000/-; under S.No.84 the rate per acre

is Rs.3,39,250/-; under S.No.100 the rate per acre is Rs.18 lakh;

under S.No.124 the rate per acre is Rs.3,70,000/-; in S.No.171

the rate per acre is Rs.3,40,000/-; in S.No.194 it is Rs.3,39,583/-;

under S.No.213 it is Rs.3,39,582/-; in S.Nos.227, 228 and 249, it

is Rs.8 lakh per acre; and in S.No.258 it is Rs.5,31,429/-. The

value of the land reflects in 25 sale transactions is ranging from

Rs.3 lakh to Rs.18 lakh per acre. In spite of the fact that the

acquired lands are near to said lands, the Land Acquisition Officer

has not taken into consideration the potentiality of the lands for

being used as house sites and erred in fixing the low market

value. There are approved lay out plots ranging between Ac.0.02

cents to Ac.0.08 cents and the claimant along with others

purchased the sites only for construction of houses. The Land

Acquisition Officer fixed the market value treating them as

agricultural lands, is contrary to the evidence available on record.

7. The acquired lands are 100 feet away from N.H.18 main

road. The Land Acquisition Officer has not taken into

consideration the nearby the educational institutions like Pulla

Reddy Engineering College, G.Pulla Reddy Dental College and

other educational institutions situated around the locality. The

construction activities are also going on in that area. The

acquired lands are situated at a distance of 3 Kms. to Kurnool

Municipal area. The market value for the lands acquired for Post

Graduation center is fixed at Rs.2 lakh per acre and for the lands

acquired for A.P. Housing Board in the year 2002, the rate fixed at

Rs.8 lakhs per acre. For the other sale transactions took place by

the date of notification, the market value is fixed at Rs.12 lakhs

per acre. Therefore, all the said sale transactions could not be

discarded for the reason that they are small house plots.

8. The Reference Court, having considered all the evidence

available on record in detail, held that the Land Acquisition Officer

discarded the sale transactions without any valid reason. By

contending that the extent of land for some of the sale

transactions is very small and registration is very high due to

commercial purpose, the Land Acquisition Officer by taking into

consideration the highest single sale i.e, Item No.168 dry land in

Sy.No.266/1A vide Document No.6855 dated 12.05.2002 for an

amount of Rs.79,054/- per acre, fixed the market value at

Rs.65,000/- per acre for category No.1(a), which is found to be

arbitrary and illegal.

9. Admittedly, it is for the claimant to prove his claim by

adducing legally admissible evidence to award just compensation.

The Reference Court found that the claimant having claimed

compensation of Rs.20 lakhs and Rs.25 lakhs, has not produced

any oral or documentary evidence to substantiate his claim by

examining the vendors and vendees of sale transactions. The

Reference Court, having considered the legal evidence available on

record, rightly fixed the value of the acquired dry lands at

Rs.1,50,000/- per acre along with other statutory benefits.

10. In view of the above discussion, this Court came to the

conclusion that there is no reason warranting interference of this

Court with the award passed by the Reference Court.

11. Accordingly, the land acquisition appeal suit is dismissed.

No order as to costs.

12. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending

in the appeal suit shall also stand dismissed.

___________________ M.GANGA RAO, J

___________________________ T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J

Date: 10.03.2023 anr

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO

L.A.A.S.No.1153 of 2011

Date: 10.03.2023

anr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter