Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lingumahanthi Surya Prakash Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 7457 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7457 AP
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Lingumahanthi Surya Prakash Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 28 September, 2022
      THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

               WRIT PETITION No.31781 of 2022

JUDGMENT:-

1.    Heard Sri A.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners

and learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration

for the respondent No.1, Sri G.Naresh Kumar, learned counsel,

representing Sri M.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel

for the respondent No.2, Vijayanagaram Municipal Corporation

and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the

respondent Nos.3 and 4.

2. With the consent of the parties counsels, the writ petition

is being disposed of finally at this stage.

3. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India has been filed for the following relief:-

"For the aforementioned reasons it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the respondents 2 to 4 are proposing to construct water tank in the petitioners house site Plot numbers 373, 374 and 375 approved in Sai Keerthana Nagar layout of KL Puram Village in Vizianagaram District within the limits of Vizianagaram Municipal Corporation without acquiring the land under Right to fair compensation and transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation Resettlement Act, 2013 and

without paying any compensation and without following the procedure contemplated under law as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, unjust, contrary to law and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to make any construction in petitioners plot numbers 373, 374 and 375 approved in Sai Keerthana Nagar layout of KL Puram Village in Vizianagaram District within the limits of Vizianagaram Municipal Corporation and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

4. Sri A.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 purchased Plot Nos.373

and 374 vide registered sale deed dated 13.04.2016, and the

petitioner No.3 purchased Plot No.375 vide registered sale deed

dated 21.06.2004. With respect to the said plots the statement

of encumbrance of property certificates were also issued.

Recently the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are proposing to construct

water tank over those plots of the petitioners, without acquiring

the same and without paying any compensation, contrary to law

violating the petitioners' right to property guaranteed by Article

300-A of the Constitution of India.

5. The petitioners in the above respect have submitted

various representations, the last one being to the District

Collector, Vijayanagaram dated 14.09.2022, Ex.P10, but till

date no action has been taken thereupon, on the other hand,

respondent No.2 has started construction work.

6. Sri G.Naresh Kumar, on the basis of instructions received

from the Town Planning Officer of the respondent No.2 submits

that these plots are the open space in the layout plan.

7. The controversy as to whether Plot Nos.373, 374 and 375

belong to the petitioners or are open space left in the layout

plan, being a factual controversy requiring material for proper

determination, cannot be determined in the exercise of writ

jurisdiction atleast at this stage.

8. The petitioner has already approached the District

Collector, Vijayanagaram, and in the ends of justice, it is

considered appropriate that the District Collector,

Vijayanagaram shall look into the petitioner's representation

dated 14.09.2022 and pass final order after affording

opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also the authorities of

the respondent No.2, in accordance with law, within a period of

four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order

along with copy of the petitioner's representation dated

14.09.2022. It is ordered accordingly.

9. The writ petition stands disposed of finally.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,

shall also stand closed.

__________________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J Date: 28.09.2022

Note:-

Issue C.C by 29.09.2022 B/o SCS FFFFFFFFFHGHHHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGFFFKKKKKKKKKK KKKKJJJJJKFDASDFKKKKLKKLHGGGFFFFFFFDSSSSSGG GGGGGGHHHHHGHFSDAFSDAHLFJHSDFJASD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

WRIT PETITION No.31781 of 2022

Date: 28.09.2022

Scs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter