Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7384 AP
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2022
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25718 OF 2022
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings D.O.No.1049/2018, C.No.03/PR/2016, dated 14.09.2018 issued by the respondent No.4 awarding the punishment of dismissal from service to the petitioner, without assigning any cogent reasons, without conducting fair investigation/ enquiry and also without properly considering the petitioner's submissions/ representations and without waiting for the Appellate Court orders for justifying the petitioner's innocence/ guilt is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice, non application of mind to the relevant facts of the case, violative of Rules and Guidelines in vogue, violative of Fundamental Rights Guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the said order of dismissal dated 14.09.2018 passed by the 4th respondent and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits and pass such other orders...."
2. Heard Mr. Vajja Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home for the
respondents.
3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during the course of hearing learned counsel for the
petitioner requested this Court to issue a direction to the 2nd
respondent to dispose of the Appeal filed by the petitioner dated
13.12.2021 (which is material papers 16 to 19 in the writ petition),
without touching the merits of the case.
4. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents
and readily agreed to dispose of the Appeal filed by the petitioner
dated 13.12.2021, if any pending with the respondent authorities.
5. In view of the submission of learned counsel appearing for
respondents, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the
allegations made in the petition.
6. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued in
view of the judgment of the Apex Court in The Government of
India v. P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex Court held that such
orders may be passed for a quick or easy disposal of cases in
overburdened adjudicatory institutions but, they do not serve to
the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner
himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the Appeal filed
by the petitioner dated 13.12.2021, I find no other alternative
except to issue such direction.
7. In the result, Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd
respondent to dispose of the Appeal filed by the petitioner dated
2019 (8) SCALE 544
13.12.2021, in accordance with law, within eight (08) weeks from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
___________________________ DR.K. MANMADHA RAO, J
Date: 26.09.2022
KK
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25718 OF 2022
Date: 26.09.2022
KK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!