Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8560 AP
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE : S.A.No.491 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
28.10.2022
SRS,J
S.A.No.491 of 2022
Defendants in AOS No.5 of 2012 being the
appellants filed the present second appeal against the
judgment and decree dated 25.03.2022 in A.A.S.No.17 of
2018 on the file of the Additional District Magistrate &
Additional Agent to Government-cum-Project Officer,
Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Paderu of
Visakhapatnam District, reversing the orders dated
30.04.2018 in A.O.S.No.5 of 2012 on the file of the Agency
Sub-Ordinate Judge at Paderu.
AOS No.5 of 2012 is filed by the plaintiff to grant (a)
permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their
men, agents and servants from ever interfering with the
plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint
schedule land; (b) costs of the suit and (c) grant such other
relieves.
The trial Court dismissed the AOS without costs.
Aggrieved by the same, plaintiff preferred A.A.S.No.17 of
2018 and the same was allowed. Therefore, the present
Second Appeal is filed by the defendants.
Heard.
ADMIT.
The following substantial questions of law arise for
consideration.
1) Whether the order of the lower appellate
authority is vitiated in ignoring to consider the
principle that plaintiff who filed the suit for
possession has to plead and prove his possession
over the plaint schedule property?
2) Whether the order of the lower appellate Court is
vitiated in misleading the sale deed dated
02.11.2004?
______
SRS,J
I.A.No.1 of 2022
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend
that the respondent filed AOS No.5 of 2012 on the file of
the Agency Sub-Ordinate Judge at Paderu seeking injunction. No interim injunction was granted pending the proceedings in AOS No.5 of 2012. Eventually, AOS No.5 of 2012 is dismissed.
Against the dismissal order, the respondent filed AAS No.17 of 2018 and by allowing the appeal, appellate authority directed the Tahsildar to rectify the error in survey number and extent in the previous registered document in Sy.No.102/1 Ac.0-50 cents as per records and enjoyment on the scheduled land.
Against the same, present second appeal is filed by the defendants. Since the second appeal is admitted, there shall be stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 25.03.2022 in AAS No.17 of 2018, until further orders.
Issue Notice to the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondent by registered post with acknowledgment due and file acknowledgment within two (2) weeks in the Registry.
List on 06.12.2022.
It is made clear that if learned counsel for the petitioner fails to file postal receipt within two weeks, the interim order stands vacated without any further reference.
_________ SRS,J KA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!