Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2428 AP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022
1
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No. 13720 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.
ORDER
No DATE
DEV,J
06 .05. 22 W.P.NO.13720 OF 2022
Notice before admission.
Learned Government Pleader for Education takes
notices for the Respondents.
Post on 22.06.2022 for filing Counter Affidavits by the Respondents.
_ ____ DEV,J I.A.NO.1 OF 2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Government Pleader for Education and perused
the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Respondent No.2 has issued the impugned proceedings
in R.C.No.ESE02-28023/23/2021-PLG-CSE, dated
24.11.2021, directing all the Regional Joint Directors and
District Educational Officers in the State to issue Show
Cause Notices to all the schools as to why the recognition
should not be withdrawn wherever the enrolment is less
than 20 from Classes I to V or Zero enrolment and
finalize the action as prescribed under Rule 16 of the
Andhra Pradesh Right of Children to Free and Compulsory
Education Rules, 2010( for short 'Rules, 2010').
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits
that the Rules, 2010, were issued by the State
Government under the provisions of the Right of Children
to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. These
rules are not applicable to the members of the
petitioner's association as the members of the petitioners'
association are private unaided institutions and they are
not receiving any aid from the Government.
To support his contention, the learned counsel for
the petitioners placed reliance of the Judgment of Hon'ble
Apex Court in the case of Society for Un-aided Private
Schools of Rajasthan V U.O.I and another (Writ
Petition (Civil) No.98 of 2010, dated 12.04.2012),
wherein it is held that the rights of children to free and
compulsory education guaranteed under the Article 21-A
and RTE can be enforced against the schools defined
under Section 2 (n) of the Act, except unaided minority
and non minority schools not receiving any kind of aid or
grants to meet their expenses from the appropriate
governments or local authorities.
On perusal of the Rules, 2010 also, except Rule
14, which provides for recognition of the School, and Sub
Rule 4 (h) (i) of Rule 14, wherein it is stated that the
school has to give reservation of minimum 25% to the
students of its enrolment, in all other aspects,
Government has no role against the Petitioners'
Institutions.
For the above said reasons, in the prima facie
opinion of this Court, the impugned Proceedings issued
by the Respondent No.2, dated 24.11.2021, is contrary to
the Andhra Pradesh Right of Children to Free and
Compulsory Education Rules, 2010 and the Judgment of
the Apex Court in Society for Un-aided Private
Schools of Rajasthan V U.O.I and another.
Accordingly, there shall be interim suspension of the
impugned Proceedings issued by the Respondent No.2
vide R.C.No.ESE02-28023/23/2021-PLG-CSE, dated
24.11.2021.
_ ____ DEV,J Note: Issue CC today.
B/o eha
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!