Sunday, 19, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Mohan, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2022 Latest Caselaw 2245 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2245 AP
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
G.Mohan, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 May, 2022
Bench: Ravi Cheemalapati
                                                                                      RC,J
                                                                      W.P.No.27121 of 2021

                                            1


                 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

                       WRIT PETITION No. 27121 of 2021

ORDER:

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner invoking the

jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the

following relief:

".... to issue an order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent No.2 in not processing the pension proposals dated 10.11.2018 of the petitioner who retired as Head Master in the 3rd respondent aided school on 31.10.2018, as illegal, improper, unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, declare the action of the respondent No.2 in not processing pension proposals for the last three (03) years, thus violating my right to life under Article 21, as unconstitutional, consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to process petitioner's pension proposals and forward the same to the concerned Accountant General who is competent to sanction the retirement benefits...."

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Gangaiah Naidu,

learned senior counsel for the petitioner, while submitting that the petitioner,

as remainders, submitted letters dated 10.11.2018, 20.11.2019 and

06.08.2021 to the 2nd respondent to forward his pension proposals to the

office of the Accountant General for early sanction of pension, but the 2nd

respondent kept them pending, requested this Court that an order directing

the 2nd respondent to dispose the letters submitted by the petitioner would

suffice for the time being. The learned senior counsel further submitted that

the petitioner's case is supported by judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court.

RC,J W.P.No.27121 of 2021

2

3. The learned Government Pleader for School Education submitted that

if such a direction is given, the 2nd respondent would dispose of the

representations made by the petitioner by way of letters referred to above,

however requested this Court to direct the petitioner to submit a

representation afresh to obviate any inconvenience and further delay.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on record,

this Court, without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit and

appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, with a direction to the petitioner to

submit representation afresh in consonance with his letters dated

10.11.2018, 20.11.2019 and 06.08.2021 by raising all the pleas and duly

enclosing the judicial pronouncements in support of his claim, within a week

from this day and on such representation, the 2nd respondent is directed to

dispose it of preferably within four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of the

said representation. There shall be no order as to costs.

As sequel thereto, miscellaneous petition, if any, pending shall stand

closed. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.

_________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 04th May, 2022 RR RC,J W.P.No.27121 of 2021

3

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION No.27121 of 2021

4TH May, 2022

RR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz