Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Criminal Procedure vs Unknown
2022 Latest Caselaw 1484 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1484 AP
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Criminal Procedure vs Unknown on 25 March, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1952 OF 2022

ORDER:-

This Criminal Petition under Section 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

The petitioner is A-2 in S.C.No.37 of 2020 on the file of the

learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Bhimavaram.

A case under Sections 302, 120(B) r/w 34 IPC was

registered against him along with other accused.

Briefly stated, it is the case of the prosecution that

previously the deceased in this case lodged report with the police

against A-1 and A-2 in this crime alleging that they have attempted

to kill him. A case in Crime No.85 of 1998 was registered under

Section 307 r/w 34 IPC in II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram.

Eventually after trial, both A-1 and A-2 herein were found guilty of

committing the offence punishable under Section 307 r/w 34 IPC

against the deceased in this case and they were convicted for the

said offence and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment

for a period of ten years and to pay fine. Appeal preferred against

the said judgment of conviction and sentence by them was also

dismissed. Even when they went up to the Supreme Court, the

Hon'ble Apex Court also confirmed the said judgment of conviction

and sentence. Therefore, they are undergoing imprisonment in the

said case and they are in jail.

While so, the complainant in the said case in Crime No.85 of

1998 was subsequently murdered in this crime. It is the case of

the prosecution that as A-1 and A-2 were convicted in a case

registered on the basis of the report lodged by the deceased herein,

they hatched up a conspiracy to kill him while they are in jail and

they engaged the services of A-4 to A-6 with the help of the brother

of A-2, who is A-3, and got complainant murdered in this crime.

Therefore, it is stated that the petitioner has committed the

offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B r/w 34 IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The facts of the case show that the petitioner herein was

convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 307

r/w 34 IPC along with A-1. The appeal preferred by them was

dismissed and even the Apex Court has confirmed the said

judgment of conviction and sentence. Therefore, they bore grudge

against the de facto complainant in Crime No.85 of 1998 at whose

instance the said criminal prosecution was launched against them

for the offence punishable under Section 307 r/w 34 IPC and they

were convicted and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment. So,

they hatched up a conspiracy while they are in jail undergoing

imprisonment in the said case to commit murder of the said

complainant and accordingly they engaged the services of A-4 to A-

6 and got him murdered.

Therefore, the complicity of the petitioner in committing the

offence of criminal conspiracy punishable under Section 120B IPC

to commit murder of the deceased is very much apparent from the

facts of the case. Therefore, in view of the gravity of the offences in

which the petitioner is involved and as he hatched up a conspiracy

even while he was undergoing imprisonment in jail along with A-1

and as the case is now ripe for trial, this Court is of the considered

view that the petitioner is not entitled to bail. If he is released on

bail, there is every likelihood of the petitioner tampering with the

prosecution evidence and also interfering with the trial processes.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner

in the said facts and circumstances of the case.

Resultantly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

However, as the petitioner is under trial prisoner in the

above crime along with A-1, the trial Court is directed to

immediately frame the charges in this case and fix a trial schedule

and complete trial of the case within three months from the date of

receipt of this order.

________________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

Date: 25-03-2022 AKN

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1952 OF 2022

Date: 25-03-2022

AKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter