Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3159 AP
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No: S.A.NO.269 OF 2022
PROCEEDINGS SHEET
Sl. OFFICE NOTE
No.
DATE ORDER
1. 29.06.2022 KSR,J
S.A.NO.269 OF 2022
Heard Sri Devalaraju Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the
appellants.
The plaintiffs in O.S.No.1033 of 2003 on the file of the court of
Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada are the appellants herein.
They filed the above suit against the respondents seeking mandatory
injunction. The respondents contested the suit by filing a written statement. After an elaborate trial, the trial court decreed the suit. On an appeal, the lower appellate court reversed the said judgment.
In view of the above facts and circumstances and in view following substantial question of law,
1. Whether the lower appellate court is right in reversing the judgment of the trial court by misreading the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiffs?
2. Whether the lower appellate court is justified in ignoring the part of Advocate Commissioner's report, dated 25-08-2014, which is marked as Ex.C-1, which shows that the defendants encroached upon the suit schedule path way?.
ADMIT the Second Appeal.
_________________
K.SURESH REDDY,J
TSNR
Sl. OFFICE NOTE
No.
DATE ORDER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!