Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 238 AP
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE No: Crl.R.C.No.301 OF 2008
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. OFFICE
DATE ORDER
No NOTE.
RNT,J
04. 19.01.2022 (Proceedings through virtual mode)
Sri A.Venkata Durga Rao, learned counsel for the
petitioner/revisionist, submits that the
respondent/accused (respondent No.1) has died.
The prayer in the revision is to set aside the judgment of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur in Crl.A.No.30 of 2006, dated 23.11.2007 subsequently impose the punishment along with fine against the respondent/accused (respondent No.1).
The matter arises out of the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur convicted and sentenced the respondent/accused (respondent No.1) to undergo R.I for a period of four (04) months and also sentenced to pay Rs.500/- I/D. to suffer R.I for one month.
The appeal filed by respondent No.1 was partly allowed. The conviction was maintained, but the punishment of imprisonment was set aside and the fine amount of Rs.500/- was enhanced to Rs.25,000/- out of which, it was directed that Rs.20,000/- shall be paid to the complainant/revisionist.
In view of the prayer made in the revision to impose the punishment of sentence on respondent No.1 and the death of respondent No.1, the point that arises is as to whether the revision can be proceeded with any further.
Sri A.Venkata Durga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner/revisionist, prays for two (02) days time to look into the matter.
List on 24.01.2022.
________ RNT,J Scs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!