Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T. Chandramouli vs T. Sahadeva Sharma
2022 Latest Caselaw 783 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 783 AP
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
T. Chandramouli vs T. Sahadeva Sharma on 10 February, 2022
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                         &
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                      WRIT APPEAL No. 168 of 2022

                          (Proceedings through virtual mode)

T. Chandramouli,
S/o. late Veerabhadraiah Sharma,
Hindu, aged 67 years, r/o. D.No.13/575-3,
Heriditary Archaka, Sri Bugga Ramalingeswara Swamy
Devasthanam, K.V. Reddy Nagar, Tadipatri,
Ananthapur District and others.                    .. Appellants

          Versus

T. Sahadeva Sharma
S/o. late Veerabhadraiah Sharma,
Hindu, aged 57 years,
R/o. D.No.15/1149-5-6107,
Gokulam Apartment,
Sanjeeva Nagar, 5th Road,
Tadipatri-515 411,
Anantapur District and others.                                 ..Respondents

Counsel for the Appellants                    : Mr. D.V. Sasidhar

Counsel for respondent No.1/petitioner : Mr. Motupalli Vijaya Kumar

Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4             : Government Pleader for Endowments

Counsel for respondent Nos.5 & 6              : Mr. G. Ramana Rao,
                                                Standing Counsel

                             JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Dt: 10.02.2022 (per Prashant Kumar Mishra, CJ)

The present writ appeal is preferred against an interim order

dated 25.01.2022 in W.P. No.1890 of 2022 passed by the learned single

Judge, suspending the operation of the impugned proceedings for a

period of eight (08) weeks.

Instead of preferring a vacate petition, the appellants, who are

arrayed as respondents No.5 to 9 in the writ petition, have rushed to the

appellate court. We are not inclined to entertain this writ appeal against

the interim order of the learned single Judge. However, liberty is

reserved in favour of the appellants to prefer vacate petition before the

learned single Judge.

Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Pending

miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J

GM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter