Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9762 AP
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE : S.A.No.552 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
1. 20.12.2022
SRS,J
I.A.No.1 of 2022
This application is filed to condone the delay of 73
days in representing the above second appeal.
For the reasons mentioned in Para No.2 of the
affidavit, the delay of 73 days in representing the second
appeal is condoned.
Accordingly, this petition is ordered.
______
SRS,J
S.A.No.552 of 2022
Plaintiff in the suit filed the present second appeal
against the judgment and decree dated 15.06.2022 in
A.S.No.25 of 2019 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge,
Razole, partly reversing the judgment and decree dated
23.03.2018 in O.S.No.197 of 2008 on the file of the Junior
Civil Judge, Razole.
O.S.No.197 of 2008 is filed to declare his title in
respect of western side compound wall shown as XX1, YY1
and ZZ1 marked portion in plaint plan and for grant of
mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove
the roof extended into plaint schedule property at YY1
marked portion in the plaint plan and for costs.
The trial Court dismissed the suit with costs.
Aggrieved by the same, plaintiff preferred appeal A.S.No.25
of 2019 and the same was allowed in part. Hence, the
present Second Appeal is filed by the plaintiff.
Heard.
ADMIT.
The following substantial questions of law arise for
consideration.
1) Whether the judgment of the lower appellate
Court is vitiated in not appreciating the
advocate-commissioner's report?
2) Whether granting of mandatory injunction
without granting the relief of declaration is
vitiated the judgments?
______
SRS,J
I.A.No.2 of 2022
This application is filed seeking temporary
injunction restraining the respondents from removing
the western side compound wall and restraining them from interfering with their possession and enjoyment.
Heard.
In view of the averments in the affidavit that taking advantage of the dismissal of the suit since the respondents are trying to remove the disputed compound wall, in the interest of justice, this Court is inclined to grant injunction.
The respondents are restrained to removing the disputed compound wall and restrained to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff for a period of eight weeks from today.
Issue notice to the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents by registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.
List the matter on 31.01.2023
______ SRS,J I.A.No.3 of 2022
Issue notice to the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents by registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.
List the matter on 31.01.2023.
______ SRS,J
KA/BRS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!