Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5831 AP
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.369 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
01. 30.08.2022 SRS,J
S.A.No.369 of 2022
Plaintiffs filed the present second appeal
against the judgment and decree, dated
21.06.2022 passed in A.S.No.7 of 2018 on the file
of learned Judge, Principal district Judge,
Kurnool, reversing the judgment and decree, dated
02.11.2017 passed in O.S.No.289 of 2011 on the
file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge,
Kurnool.
Plaintiff filed O.S.No.289 of 2011 seeking
partition of plaint schedule property into seven
equal shares allotting 1/7th share to the plaintiff,
appointing a Commissioner to divide the
properties and allot 1/7th share to the plaintiff by
passing a final decree directing the defendants to
deliver possession of the same and Rs.5,000/-
towards past mesne profits for two years with
future interest at 12% per annum from the date of
suit till payment.
The trial Court decreed the suit with costs.
Preliminary decree was passed that the suit
schedule property be divided into seven equal
shares and allot 1/7th share to the plaintiff within
three months from the date of judgment, failing
which plaintiff is at liberty to get the relief by
following due process of law, and also held that
plaintiff is entitled for past mesne profits from the
date of suit till the date of realization with mesne
profits from the date of suit till the date of
realization with interest at 12% per annum.
Aggrieved by the judgment of the trial
Court, respondents/defendants preferred A.S.No.7
of 2018 and the same was allowed setting aside the judgment of the trial Court. Against the judgment of lower appellate Court, plaintiff filed the present second appeal.
Heard.
Admit.
The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration.
1. Whether a party in whose favour the suit is decreed, is required to file cross-appeal assailing adverse findings?
2. Whether the judgment of lower appellate Court is liable to be set aside for not considering the contentions of the appellant regarding validity of Ex.B2/Will on the ground that the finding with regard to Ex.B2/Will was not questioned before the appellate Court, in fact, submissions were made by relying upon relevant citations?
3. Whether statement in an unregistered and undisputed Will, that the testator had given some property to one of the legal heirs is a statement within the ambit of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act?
4. Whether the evidence adduced by a party can be ignored on the ground that the witness is a stranger to the property?
______ SRS,J
I.A.No.1 of 2019
Post on 05.09.2022.
______ SRS,J ikn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!