Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5432 AP
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.756 of 2019
ORDER:
The petitioner had challenged a rowdy sheet opened
against him by way W.P.No.24128 of 2018, which came to be
disposed of on 13.07.2018 directing the 3rd respondent, Deputy
Superintendent of Police, North Zone, Rajamahendravaram, to
examine the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.05.2018
in the light of the various judgments of this Court, and to
dispose of the same within two months from the receipt of the
order.
2. The petitioner had approached this Court, by way of
the present Contempt Case on the ground that the said 3rd
respondent had not disposed of the representation of the
petitioner and had violated the orders of this Court.
3. The counter has now been filed on behalf of the
respondent stating that the rowdy sheet has been opened
against the petitioner by the Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Central Zone and as such the Deputy Superintendent of Police,
North Zone, against whom the order has been passed would not
be able to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner.
4. In that view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed
leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the rowdy sheet
opened against the petitioner in an appropriate procedure.
5. Accordingly, the present contempt case is closed. There
shall be no order as to costs.
6. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,
shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
18.08.2022 MJA
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.756 of 2019
18.08.2022
MJA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!