Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3517 AP
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: SECOND APPEAL No.543 of 2019
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
2. 14.9.2021 MVR,J
Second Appeal No.543 of 2019
Heard Sri M.Bala Subrahmanyam, learned
counsel for the appellant.
Admit. The following are the substantial
questions of law:
1. Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the conclusion
of the lower appellate Court that Ex.A.2
Will was not duly proved and that Ex.B.23
Will supersede Ex.A.2 Will is one arrived at
ignoring the material on record especially
when no Attestor of Ex.B.23 Will except its
Scribe is examined, is vitiated and
unsustainable as the same was arrived at
by non-consideration of relevant evidence
or by an essentially erroneous approach to
the matter?
2. Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the reversing
Judgment of the lower appellate Court is
vitiated in that it did not come to close
quarters to the reasons assigned by the
trial Court before reversing it?
Issue notice to the respondents to submit
arguments in respect of the above substantial questions of law (Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (dead) by LRs., AIR 2019 SC 3027 followed).
List during the 3rd week of December 2021.
________ MVR,J vasu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!