Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3462 AP
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.71 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
2. 09.09.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-
I.A.No.1 of 2021 O folder
before
correcti
As seen from the postal acknowledgements filed along with ons if
any.
proof of service memo, respondents 4 to 15 are served Pl.verify
.
notices. None represented them. Service against them is
sufficient.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Considering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in
support of this petition that make out sufficient cause to
condone the delay, this petition is allowed.
______ MVR,J S.A.No.71 of 2021
Heard learned counsel for the appellants.
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the following substantial questions of law arise for determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
1. Whether the lower appellate court is justified that the very nature of the suit calls for the attention of the court to the effect that the burden is on the defendants and on such discharge of burden of proof by the appellants the onus of proof will be on the defendants Government?
2. Whether the appellate court has rightly interpreted the crucial documents, sale deeds and mortgage deed i.e. Exs.A1 to A3 or adopted a perverse approach to reach the conclusion? Issue notice to the respondents. List the matter during the 2nd week of December, 2021 along with I.A.No.2 of 2021.
______ MVR,J Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!