Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3368 AP
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: SECOND APPEAL No.448 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
1. 06.9.2021 MVR,J
Second Appeal No.448 of 2021
Heard Sri Marri Venkata Ramana, learned
counsel for the appellant.
Admit. The following ares the substantial
questions of law:
1. Whether the appellate Court is justified in not
relying upon the hand writing expert evidence
which is in favour of the appellant / defendant
and which is against the evidence of plaintiff?
2. Whether the appellate Court is justified in not
considering the limited scope of transfer
endorsement made by different individuals in
favour of the plaintiff and therefore the
impermissibility to join cause of action and to
initiate a common suit?
Issue notice to the respondent to submit
arguments in respect of the above substantial questions of law (Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil vs. Tamilarasi (dead) by LRs., AIR 2019 SC 3027 followed).
List during the 3rd week of November 2021.
________ MVR,J I.A.No.1 of 2021 Heard.
There shall be interim stay of operation of the decree in O.S.No.5 of 2006, dated 28.10.2015, on the file of the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Parchur, confirmed by the decree and judgment dated 09.6.2021 in A.S.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Court of learned VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole, subject to the appellant depositing 50% of the decretal amount with full costs awarded by the trial Court as well as the first appellate Court, within six weeks from now to the credit of the suit, until further orders, and notice.
________ MVR,J vasu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!