Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3320 AP
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.250 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
6. 02.09.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-
O folder
S.A.No.250 of 2021 before
correcti
ons if
Heard Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned counsel for the any.
Pl.verify
appellant and Sri Harish Kumar Rasineni, learned counsel for .
the respondents.
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the following substantial questions of law arise for determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
1. Whether the findings of the Courts below on facts are contrary to the evidence on record and are perverse and judgment and decree of the Courts below are vitiated by non-consideration of Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 and oral evidence of PW.1 to PW.3?
2. Whether the suit for permanent injunction without seeking declaration of title to protect the possession and enjoyment of the appellant in respect of suit schedule property is maintainable when there was no denial of title of the plaintiff and the conclusion of the lower appellate court that suit for bare injunction without seeking declaration of title not mandible is legal and valid? Issue notice to the respondents.
List the matter during the 1st week of December, 2021.
______ MVR,J Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!