Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sugali D Venkateswara Naik vs Gundu Venkata Swamy And Another
2021 Latest Caselaw 3320 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3320 AP
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Sugali D Venkateswara Naik vs Gundu Venkata Swamy And Another on 2 September, 2021
                   HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.250 of 2021
                                         PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.      Date                                     ORDER                                    OFFICE
No.                                                                                         NOTE
6.    02.09.2021   MVR,J                                                                   Tr. to I-
                                                                                           O folder
                                           S.A.No.250 of 2021                               before
                                                                                           correcti
                                                                                            ons if
                      Heard Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned counsel for the                   any.
                                                                                           Pl.verify
                   appellant and Sri Harish Kumar Rasineni, learned counsel for                .
                   the respondents.

Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the following substantial questions of law arise for determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.

1. Whether the findings of the Courts below on facts are contrary to the evidence on record and are perverse and judgment and decree of the Courts below are vitiated by non-consideration of Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 and oral evidence of PW.1 to PW.3?

2. Whether the suit for permanent injunction without seeking declaration of title to protect the possession and enjoyment of the appellant in respect of suit schedule property is maintainable when there was no denial of title of the plaintiff and the conclusion of the lower appellate court that suit for bare injunction without seeking declaration of title not mandible is legal and valid? Issue notice to the respondents.

List the matter during the 1st week of December, 2021.

______ MVR,J Pab

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter