Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4362 AP
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT APPEAL No.675 of 2021
(Hybrid Hearing Through video conferencing)
Sudhireddy Lakshmaiah,
S/o Somaiah, aged about 48 years,
R/o H.No.11-60, Gurajala Town,
Gurajala Mandal, Guntur District, A.P.
and others.
..Appellants
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep., by its Chief Secretary,
General Administration Department,
Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati
and others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the appellants : Mr. Narra Srinivasa Rao
Counsel for respondent No.1 : GP for GAD
Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 : GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development.
Counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 7 : GP for Municipal Administration & Urban Development Counsel for respondent Nos.8, 10 & 11: GP for Revenue
Counsel for respondent No.9 : Mr. M. Manohar Reddy
Counsel for respondent No.12 : Mr. Vivek Chandra Sekhar HCJ & AVSS,J
ORAL JUDGMENT Dt:27.10.2021
(per Prashant Kumar Mishra, CJ)
This appeal is preferred against an order dated 25.10.2021 passed
by learned single Judge in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No.24321 of 2021.
2. Challenging the constitution of Gurajala Nagar Panchayat by
merging the areas covered under Gurajala Gram Panchayat and
Jangamaheswarapuram Gram Panchayat, the appellants/writ petitioners
filed W.P.No.24321 of 2021 along with I.A.No.1 of 2021, an application
seeking a direction to respondent No.12 not to issue any election
notification for the newly constituted Gurajala Nagar Panchayat of Guntur
District.
3. The learned single Judge having found that the writ petitioners
kept quiet for nearly two years after formation of Nagar Panchayat and
now, when respondent No.12 is proceeding to conduct elections for the
newly constituted Nagar Panchayat, they approached this Court by
challenging the constitution of Gurajala Nagar Panchayat and seeking a
direction to respondent No.12 not to issue election notification, observed
that in the prima facie opinion of the Court, the writ petitioners are not
entitled to stall the election process.
4. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants for some
time. However, we are not convinced with his submissions for issuing any
direction to respondent No.12 to stall the elections. On perusal of the
subject notifications (i) G.O.Ms.No.247, Panchayat Raj and Rural
Development (E&R) Department, dated 25.01.2020, by which, in exercise
of powers conferred under Clauses (f) of sub-section (2) of Section 3 of
the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, the earlier notification HCJ & AVSS,J
issued constituting the Grampanchayats has been cancelled, and (ii)
G.O.Ms.No.73 Municipal Administration & Urban Development (G)
Department, dated 25.01.2020, by which, in exercise of powers conferred
under Clause (42-a) of Section 2 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act,
1965 (the Andhra Pradesh Act No.6 of 1965), read with Rule 2 of the
Andhra Pradesh Constitution of Nagar Panchayats and Municipalities
Rules, 2019, new Gurajala Nagar Panchayat has been constituted, we are
not inclined to take a different view in this matter insofar as the order
passed by the learned single Judge is concerned.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. However, any
observations made herein shall not affect the appellants' case in the writ
petition, which shall be decided by the learned single Judge on its own
merits as and when pleadings are complete. We request the learned
single Judge to expedite hearing of the writ petition. No costs. Pending
miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand dismissed.
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ A.V. SESHA SAI, J
Nn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!