Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4180 AP
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
I.A. No. 2 OF 2021 in WRIT APPEAL No. 172 of 2021
&
WRIT APPEAL No. 172 of 2021
(Hybrid hearing through video conferencing)
Puvvada Venkata Rama Krishna
S/o. late Narasimha Swamy,
69 years, R/o. H.No.45-1-150,
Kothapatnam road, Ongole-523 001,
Prakasam District and others. .. Appellants/
Third parties
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Rep.by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department,
Government of Andhra Praesh,
Secretariat Building, A.P. Secretariat,
Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh and others. .. Respondents
Counsel for the Appellants : Mr. Marella Radha
Counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. G.L. Nageswara Rao G.P. for Revenue
Counsel for respondent No.5/ writ petitioner : Dr. K. Manmadha Rao
ORAL JUDGMENT Dt: 22.10.2021 (per Prashant Kumar Mishra, CJ)
Ms. Marella Radha, learned counsel for the appellants submits
that the directions issued in the order dated 23.12.2020 passed by the
learned single judge in W.P. No.24731 of 2020, which was filed by the
respondent No.5/writ petitioner, relate to the land in question belongs to
the appellants.
2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the
appellants, I.A. No.2 of 2021, which is an application seeking leave to
file the writ appeal, is allowed.
3. At this stage, Mr. G.L. Nageswara Rao, learned Government
Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents No.1 to 4 submits
that pursuant to the directions issued by the learned single Judge in
W.P. No.24731 of 2020, the respondent No.4 i.e., the Tahasildar, Ongole
Mandal, Ongole, Prakasam District, has completed the enquiry, but
rejected the prayer of the respondent No.5/writ petitioner for issuance
of pattadar passbook in respect of the land in question.
4. In view of the above, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ
appeal and the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. However, if the
respondent No.5/writ petitioner moves any Court including this Court
against the refusal of her representation by the respondent No.4, the
appellants herein would be entitled to intervene or implead as parties in
the proceedings.
5. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J
GM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
I.A. No. 2 OF 2021 in WRIT APPEAL No. 172 of 2021 & WRIT APPEAL No. 172 of 2021
(per Prashant Kumar Mishra, CJ)
Dt: 22.10.2021
GM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!