Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaik Masthan Saheb vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 4170 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4170 AP
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Shaik Masthan Saheb vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 22 October, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
   THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                  WRIT PETITION NO.20247 OF 2021


ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India seeking the following relief:

"To issue an order or orders or direction or a writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 in not considering the representation dated 17.07.2021 for regularizing the Plot No.386 in Survey No.1768 of Chennampalli Village, Badvel Mandal, YSR Kadapa District as per the G.O.Ms.No.203, dated 20.07.2020 for regularization of assigned house site in favour of the alienee as illegal arbitrary and in violation of principles Natural Justice and in violation Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to consider the representation dated 17.07.2021 for regularizing the Plot No.386 in Survey No.1768 of Chennampalli Village, Badvel Mandal, YSR Naciapil District".

Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner

requested this Court without touching the merits of the case,

requests this Court to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose

of the representation/application of the petitioner dated 17.07.2021.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily

agreed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated

17.07.2021, if any, pending with the respondents authorities.

In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Revenue, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the

allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no

such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court

in "The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex

Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of

cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not

service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the

petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the

representation dated 17.07.2021 of the petitioner, I find no other

alternative except to issue such direction.

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the

respondent authorities herein to dispose of the

application/representation of the petitioner dated 17.07.2021, in

accordance with law, within four(4) weeks from the date of receipt of

copy of this order. No costs.

The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand

closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Date: 22.10.2021 tm

2019 (8) SCALE 544

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

WRIT PETITION NO.20247 OF 2021

Date: 22-10-2021 tm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter