Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4044 AP
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE No.:A.S.No.446 of 2012
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Office
DATE ORDER
No Note
3. 12.10.2021 MGR, J
Transferr
ed to I/O
I.A.No.1 of 2021 folder
before
correctio
Learned counsel for the petitioner is
n
permitted to take out personal notice on the
respondents through R.P.A.D and file proof of
service in the Registry.
The present appeal is filed aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.69 of 2020 dated 05.03.2012 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, FTC, Anantapur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the appeal, this Court on 03.07.2012 granted order stating that any alienation shall be subject to the result of the appeal. Now the respondents 1 and 2 died. Therefore the 3rd respondent is taking steps to demolish the suit schedule property with an intention to make fresh constructions, thereby defeating the rights of the petitioner/appellant.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submissions of the learned counsel, and on a perusal of the material record, this Court prima facie found that the petitioner has shown sufficient cause for grant of an interim direction.
Accordingly, the respondents are directed not to make any constructions/deviations in the suit schedule property.
Post on 30.11.2021.
________ MGR, J EPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!