Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Danaboyina Santosha Rupavani, vs Shaik Jabeen
2021 Latest Caselaw 4016 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4016 AP
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Danaboyina Santosha Rupavani, vs Shaik Jabeen on 8 October, 2021
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI

     HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                &
             HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

                              I.A.No.1 of 2021
                                     in
                        WRIT APPEAL No.646 of 2021
                                    and
                        WRIT APPEAL No.646 of 2021

                        (Through Video-Conferencing)

Danaboyina Santosha Rupavani, W/o. Venkateswara,
Aged about 38 years, D.No.1-88A, Emani, Guntur,
Andhra Pradesh                                                  Applicant/ Appellant

                                      Versus

Shaik Jabeen, W/o. Shaik Sadik, aged about 26 years,
Occ: MPP member, R/o.5/199, Chiluvuru, Guntur,
Andhra Pradesh, and others                                         ... Respondents

Counsel for the applicant/appellant : Mr. S. Lakshminarayana Reddy

Counsel for respondent No.1 : Mr. D. Srinivas, Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. G. Subba Rao

Counsel for respondent No.2, 4 & 7 : Mr. Syed Khader Masthan

Counsel for respondent No.3 : Mr. Vivek S Chandrasekhar

ORAL JUDGMENT

Dt:08.10.2021

(Arup Kumar Goswami, CJ)

Heard Mr. S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the

applicant/appellant, Mr. D. Srinivas, learned senior counsel assisted by

Mr. G. Subba Rao - learned counsel for respondent No.1, Mr. Syed Khader

Masthan, learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.2, 4 to 7

and Mr. Vivek S Chandrasekhar, learned standing counsel for respondent

No.3.

2. I.A.No.1 of 2021 is an application for grant of leave to appeal against

the order dated 07.10.2021 passed in W.P.No.23133 of 2021.

3. The case of writ petitioner (respondent No.1) is that she belongs to

Shaik caste and the same is categorised as BC-E category. She was elected

to MPTC from Chiluvuru-1. The post of President of Mandal Praja Parishad, 2 HCJ & NJS,J I.A.No.1 of 2021 in/and W.A.No.646 of 2021

Duggirala Mandal, Guntur District is reserved for BC Category and she was

selected by TDP/Jana Sena parties to contest as President of Mandal Praja

Parishad. She prayed for a caste certificate along with relevant materials on

20.09.2021 so as to enable her to contest the election for the post of

President, which was originally scheduled on 24.09.2021. As no prompt

action was taken by the authorities, she filed W.P.No.21353 of 2021. During

the pendency of the said writ petition, her application was rejected by

proceedings dated 22.09.2021. Against rejection of her application, she filed

an appeal before respondent No.3 on 24.09.2021.

4. The election, however, could not take place on 24.09.2021 due to lack

of quorum and subsequently, by notification dated 01.10.2021, the same was

scheduled today, i.e. on 08.10.2021.

5. The applicant has sought for grant of leave to prefer appeal on the

ground that because of the stay of the election process by the learned single

Judge by the order impugned, her right to contest for the election for the post

of President, Mandal Praja Parishad, Duggirala Mandal, Guntur District, is

impinged. However, she has not mentioned in the affidavit filed in I.A.No.1 of

2021 as well as in the writ appeal that she belongs to BC category. In order to

be absolutely certain as to whether any such averments are made, we asked

Mr. Lakshminarayana Reddy as to whether any such averment that the

applicant belongs to BC category is made. Mr. Reddy fairly submits that no

such averment is made either in I.A.No.1 of 2021 or in the appeal.

6. In that view of the matter, we see no good ground to grant leave to

appeal and, accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2021 is dismissed.

7. Consequently, W.A.No.646 of 2021 shall stand dismissed. No order as

to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CJ                               NINALA JAYASURYA, J
MRR
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter