Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Srinivasulu Naidu, vs Sri S.H.Rasheed,
2021 Latest Caselaw 4874 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4874 AP
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
M.Srinivasulu Naidu, vs Sri S.H.Rasheed, on 29 November, 2021
Bench: C.Praveen Kumar, The Honourable Justice
     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR

                CONTEMPT CASE No.999 of 2021

ORDER:-


      The present Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10

to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the

respondents, for willful and deliberate violation of the Order,

dated 03.02.2020, passed in W.P.No.36301 of 2018, which is

as under:

" ...directing the 1st respondent to take further action and pass appropriate orders regularizing the suspension period of the petitioner and granting consequential benefits, keeping in view the judgment referred above and also the fact that the petitioner was acquitted from criminal case.

The writ petition, with the above direction, is disposed of...."

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today,

Sri Santhapur Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel for the

petitioner placed on record a Memo, dated 16.11.2021,

issued by the concerned, which reads as under:

"In the reference 11th cited, orders were issued to Sri M. Srinivasulu Naidu, Ex-AE/O/RURALS Section/Nandikotkur dropping further action in C.C.No.23 of 2015 and regularizing the suspension period from 28.05.2014 to 26.07.2015 as leave which he is eligible limiting the pay and allowance to the subsistence allowance already paid subject to outcome of criminal appeal No.1388 of 2017 pending in Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

2. During the hearings held on 09.11.2021 in C.C.No.999 of 2021, the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. has observed that in absence of any order in Criminal Appeal, prima-facie there is no justification to withhold the payments as ordered in the writ petition.

3. In view of the above, the Chairman and Managing Director/APSPDCL, who is the disciplinary authority has reconsidered the issue and decided to treat the period of suspension from 28.05.2014 to 26.07.2015 as spent on duty, subject to outcome of criminal Appeal No.1388 of 2017 pending in the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

4. Accordingly, in continuation to the orders issued in the reference 11th cited, it is ordered that, the suspension period from 28.05.2014 to 26.07.2015 undergone by Sri M. Srinivasulu Naidu, Ex-AE/O/Rural Section/Nandikotkur, Kurnool District (Now Dy.EE/Operation/Kalyandurgam) is treated as spent on duty with a condition that the same will be reviewed basing on the outcome of pending criminal Appeal No.1388 of 2017 before Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh".

3. Since the order impugned in this case has been

complied with, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be

no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this

Contempt Case shall stand closed.

_______________________________ JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR

Date: 29.11.2021

MS

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR

CONTEMPT CASE No.999 of 2021

Date: 29.11.2021

MS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter