Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yallapragadasrirama Chandra ... vs The State Of A.P,
2021 Latest Caselaw 4503 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4503 AP
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Yallapragadasrirama Chandra ... vs The State Of A.P, on 3 November, 2021
Bench: R Raghunandan Rao
    THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

             WRIT PETITION No.25395 of 2021


ORDER:-

     The petitioner sought to be recognized as a member of the

founder family in respect of Sri Poleramma Ammavari Temple,

Peddapalli, Nagaram, Guntur District. On the basis of the said

application of the petitioner, the Assistant Commissioner of

Endowments, Guntur submitted a report to the Commissioner,

Endowments. In this report, it was stated that Sri Yellaparagada

Narasimha Rao was the founder of the institution and handed

over the temple to the department in the year 1987-1988 while

discharging the functions of the Trustee of the temple.    It is

further stated that though there are no records or orders about

the recognition of the founder family members, the statement in

the register maintained under Section 38 of the Andhra Pradesh

Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments

Act, 1966 (for short 'the 1966 Act') and the statement in the

register maintained under Section 43 of the Andhra Pradesh

Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments

Act, 1987 (for short 'the 1987 Act') shows that the Yellapragada

family was recognized as the founder family.

     2.    On the basis of this report, the Commissioner,

Endowments     had    directed   the   Deputy    Commissioner,

Endowments to take necessary action, in view of the directions

of this Court in W.P.No.2596 of 2009 wherein it was held that

once a person has been recognized as a member of the founder

family or his forefathers were recognized as founder family

members under the Endowments Act of 1966, such persons can
                                2
                                                     RRR,J
                                          W.P.No.25395 of 2021

straight away approach the competent authority for recognition,

without approaching the Endowments Tribunal. This facility is

available where there is no dispute among the family members.

     3.    The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments, Guntur

who is the 3rd respondent had issued impugned proceedings

L.Dis.No.A2/ENDW-RADMOGEN/3/19, dated 17.07.2020

directing the petitioner to approach the A.P.Endowments

Tribunal, for recognition as founder family member of the

subject temple.

4. When there is no dispute that the father of the

petitioner had been recognized as the founder of the temple and

the same had been recorded in the Statutory Registers

maintained both under the 1966 Act and the 1987 Act, it would

not be appropriate for the Deputy Commissioner to relegate the

petitioner to the Endowments Tribunal.

5. The erstwhile High Court of A.P in the Judgment

dated 26.07.2010 in W.P.No.2596 of 2009, after a review and

analysis of the provisions of Section 17 and other provisions of

the 1987 Act, had held that once the applicant or his forefathers

are recognized as either the founder of the Endowment or as a

Hereditary Trustee of such an Endowment, it would be the

competent authority viz., the Deputy Commissioner or the

Commissioner of Endowments, who would be the appropriate

authority to grant recognition as a member of the founder family

to such an applicant. It is only in a situation where there is a

dispute between the members of the family as to whether an

RRR,J W.P.No.25395 of 2021

applicant is a member of the family or not, the said dispute has

to go before the Endowments Tribunal.

6. In the present case, there is no such dispute. It is

not clear as to what is the basis on which the 3rd respondent

has relegated the petitioner to the Endowments Tribunal.

7. In view of the matter, this writ petition is allowed

setting aside the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd

respondent vide L.Dis.No.A2/ENDW-RADMOGEN/3/19 dated

17.07.2020 with a further direction to the 3rd respondent to

consider the application of the petitioner, on the basis of the

proceedings of the Commissioner, Endowments vide

D.Dis.No.D3/COE-14021(51)/1/2020, dated 13.07.2020 and

pass appropriate orders within four weeks from the date of

receipt of this order. There shall be no orders as costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, in this Writ

petition, shall stand closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

Date : 03-11-2021 RJS

RRR,J W.P.No.25395 of 2021

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

WRIT PETITION No.25395 of 2021

Date : 03-11-2021

RJS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter