Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva ... vs Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1711 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1711 AP
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva ... vs Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva ... on 23 March, 2021
Bench: Arup Kumar Goswami, C.Praveen Kumar
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                   &
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

                        I.A.No. 1 & 4 of 2021

                                 IN/AND

                    WRIT APPEAL No.53 of 2021

                  (Taken up through video conferencing)

 Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva Sangha Samakhya
 (Registered society vide Regn.No.209/1984),
 its office at D.No.23-5-10, Vandanapuvari Veedhi,
 Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada
 (Andhra Pradesh) rep.by its President
 Jwalapuram Srikanth S/o. Srinivasacharyulu,
 r/o.D.No.6-3-130, Ramnagar,
 Ananthapuram Town,
 Ananthapuram District-510 051.               ..   Appellant

                                 Versus

 Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva Sangha Samakhya
 Registered Society vide Regn.No.209/1984)
 Rep.by its General Secretary, Konuru Satish Sharma
 S/o. Hanumantha Rao, Visakhapatnam,
 Andhra Pradesh and 2 others.                 ..  Respondents

Counsel for the Appellant : Mr.Y.V.Ravi Prasad, Sr.Counsel, Assisted by Mr.Dasari S.V.V.S.V.Prasad

Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Mr.R.Nagarjuna

Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Mr.P.Subhash, G.P. for Revenue

Counsel for Respondent No.2 : ----

ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23.03.2021

(per Arup Kumar Goswami, CJ)

Heard Mr.Y.V.Ravi Prasad, learned Senior Counsel assisted

by Mr.Dasari S.V.V.S.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant. Also

heard Mr.R.Nagarjuna, learned counsel for respondent No.1/petitioner,

Mr.P.Subhash, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent

No.3. None appears for respondent No.2.

2) I.A.No.4 of 2021, is an application to amend the cause title

of the Writ Appeal, in respect of the description of the appellant, as

follows:

"Jwalapuram Srikanth S/o. Srinivasacharyulu, r/o.D.No.6-3-130, Ramnagar, Ananthapuram Town, Ananthapuram District 510 051, President, Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva Sangha Samakhya (Registered society vide Regn.No.209/1984), its office at D.No.23- 5-10, Vandanapuvari Veedhi, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada (Andhra Pradesh)."

3) The original cause title of Writ Appeal reads as follows:

"Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva Sangha Samakhya (Registered society vide Regn.No.209/1984), its office at D.No.23-5-10, Vandanapuvari Veedhi, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada (Andhra Pradesh) rep.by its President Jwalapuram Srikanth S/o. Srinivasacharyulu, r/o.D.No.6-3-130, Ramnagar, Ananthapuram Town, Ananthapuram District-510 051. .. Appellant

And

1. Andhra Pradesh Brahmana Seva Sangha Samakhya Registered Society vide Regn.No.209/1984) Rep.by its General Secretary, Konuru Satish Sharma S/o. Hanumantha Rao, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

2. The Registrar of Societies, Office of the District Registrar, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. .. Respondents"

4) The Writ Appeal, as was originally filed, would indicate that

the same was filed by the Registered Society through the President and

the Writ Petition was filed by the Society represented by the General

Secretary. Apparently, there is a dispute amongst the members of the

society.

5) It is submitted by Mr.Y.V.Ravi Prasad, learned senior

counsel, that the writ petition was filed suppressing material facts and

in such circumstances, I.A. may be allowed. Considering the matter in

its entirety, we allow the amendment as prayed for. Accordingly,

I.A.No.4 of 2021 is allowed.

6) An application for leave to appeal is also filed, which is

I.A.No.1 of 2021.

7) Having regard to the subject matter projected, we are not

inclined to grant leave to appeal. If according to the appellant he was a

necessary party, he may file appropriate application before the learned

single Judge, if so advised.

8) Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

closed.

ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CJ C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J

GM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter