Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mettu Niranjan Reddy vs Nil
2021 Latest Caselaw 1237 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1237 AP
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Mettu Niranjan Reddy vs Nil on 1 March, 2021
Bench: B Krishna Mohan
        * HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

          + CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.90 of 2021

% 01.03.2021

# Mettu Niranjan Reddy and another

                                               ... Petitioners

                                 Vs.

$ NIL

                                             .... Respondents



! Counsel for the petitioners: SRI S.S.N.MOORTHY



Counsel for the Respondent:



<Gist :




>Head Note:




? Cases referred:
Review Petition (C) No.472 of 2018 in
Transfer Petition (c) No.1252 of 2016
                              2




HIGH COUIRT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATHI.

      HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

Between:

Mettu Niranjan Reddy and another

                                                ... Petitioners

                            Vs.

NIL
                                               .... Respondent


Date of Judgment Pronounced: 01.03.2021

Submitted for Approval:


                 SMT JUSTICE T. RAJANI

  1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers      Yes/No
     may be allowed to see the judgments?

  2. Whether the copies of judgment may be      Yes/No
     marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

  3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to      Yes/No
     see the fair copy of the Judgment ?



                          ________________________________
                            JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
                                   3




       HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

          CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.90 of 2021

ORDER:

The petitioners herein filed this revision petition against the

order in I.A.No.420 of 2020 in FCOP No.43 of 2020 on the file of

the XII Additional District Court, Guntur, dated 30.11.2020.

2. Heard the counsel for the petitioners.

3. The 1st petitioner is the husband and the 2nd petitioner is the

wife. In view of the matrimonial disputes they have filed jointly

FCOP No.43 of 2020 on the file of the court of XII Additional

District Court, Guntur, seeking for dissolution of Marriage dated

06.05.2017 by way of mutual consent under Section 13B of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The 1st petitioner is represented by the

GPA Holder and the 2nd petitioner was present at the time of

institution of OP. Thereafter, the 2nd petitioner is also represented

by the GPA Holder in the subsequent proceedings. While so,

they have jointly filed an I.A.No.420 of 2020 in the said OP before

the Family Court seeking to grant permission to examine

themselves through video conference to record their evidence and

other proceedings. The same was considered and allowed by the

Family Court to an extent of granting permission to record the

evidence of the petitioners through video conference but insisted

physical presence for the purpose of making an effort of

reconciliation of the petitioners by way of its order dated

30.11.2020. The petitioners filed this revision insofar as the order

of physical presence for reconciliation is concerned.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners rely upon the

decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in

ANJALI BRAHMAWAR CHAUHAN VS. NAVIN CHAUHAN

in Review Petition (C) No.472 of 2018 in Transfer Petition (c)

No.1252 of 2016 dated 22.01.2021 in which their Lordships at

paragraph 3 held as follows:

"3. Notice was issued in the Review Petition on 20.03.2018. Due to the ongoing pandemic, physical functioning of the Courts has been stopped since March, 2020. Proceedings in all Courts are being conducted only through vide conferencing. In the normal course we would not have directed video conferencing in respect of matrimonial matters as per the judgment of this court mentioned above. However, in the present situation where all proceedings are conducted through video conferencing, we direct the Family Court, District Gautambudh Nagar, UP to conduct the trial through video conferencing."

5. Following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of

India, this court modifies the order of the Family Court dated

30.11.2020 directing the Family Court to consider reconciliation

proceedings also through video conference apart from the other

proceedings before it in the said OP while dealing with the same

as per law in view of the pandemic situation due to COVID-19.

It is made clear that this order is passed due to the prevailing

situation as indicated above.

6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

No costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall

stand closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN February 12, 2021

Note: -

LR Copy to be marked {B/o} LMV

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.90 of 2021

March 1, 2021

LMV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter