Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2515 AP
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.81 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
2. 20.07.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-O
folder before
S.A.No.81 of 2021 corrections if
any.
Pl.verify.
Heard Sri Marri Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for
the appellant.
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of
the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the
following substantial questions of law arise for
determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
1. Whether the Courts below are right in ignoring
Section 22(1) and (2) of the Specific Relief Act,
1963?
2. Whether the plaintiff can be granted alternate
relief of refund of earnest money without a specific
claim/prayer in the plaint?
3. Whether the Courts below are right in arriving at a
finding of existence of privity of contract merely
basing on the ground that the defendant admitted
signatures on the disputed document?
Issue notice to the respondent to submit arguments in
respect of above substantial questions of law(Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil v. Tamilarasi(dead) by Lrs. (AIR 2019 SC 3027) followed). List the matter during the last week of October, 2021.
______ MVR,J Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!