Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vadde Chandra Sekhar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 2485 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2485 AP
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Vadde Chandra Sekhar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 20 July, 2021
Bench: D Ramesh
           THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

                WRIT PETITION NO.14236 OF 2021

ORDER:

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, seeking the following relief:

"to issue such appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing eviction orders (Final Notice) in RC.No.45/88A4/ZoneIII(Revenue) dated 11-02-2021 without any prior notice and also not considering the representation made by the petitioners associations on 27-05-2020 and 17-07-2020 for extension of lease and reduction of rental in view of COVID-19 Pandemic situation and not using the discretionary power under section 148 of VMC act in view of the present Pandemic Situation and also threatening the petitioners on 17-07-2021 to vacate the shops without following the principles of natural justice is illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the said eviction order, dated 11-02-2021 without following due process of law."

2. All the petitioners are the lease holders for the shops in TSR

Complex, Visakhapatnam by different lease deeds, executed by the

2nd respondent, in different dates. Most of their leases were

expired by September 2019 and June 2020, and some of them

existing till September 2021.

3. While things stood thus, all the petitioners have made

representations to the 2nd respondent, bringing about their

inability to pay the rents because of lack of business and non-

opening of the shops due to COVID 19 situation, i.e., almost a year

from March 2020 to June 2021, except some brief period in 2020.

They formed into an association and made a representation on

27.05.2020, 17.07.2020 to the 2nd respondent, requesting to

enhance the lease period and also to reduce the lease amount.

Some of them have also made a representation on 19.07.2021 for

extension of lease period. Though there is specific provision under

the Act, that the authorities are empowered to extend the lease

period, without extending the same, the respondent authorities

have passed the present impugned orders, on 11.02.2021 and on

the same date, directed the petitioners to vacate the lease premises

for providing the respondents to conduct public auction.

4. Sri S.Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, Standing Counsel appearing

on behalf of the respondents have submitted that for majority of

the shops, the lease period has expired a long back, as the

petitioners have not paid the rents from February 2021 onwards,

the authorities have thought to bid the subject property for public

auction, as directed by the Division Bench of this Court in

W.P.No.675 of 2017.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that in the

same judgment the Court also held that the authorities are not

precluded from extending the lease period taking the factual

aspects into consideration, in view of the same, requested to direct

the respondents to consider the representations made by the

petitioners on sympathetic view, to extend the lease period with a

considerable time.

6. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted

that the authorities would consider the representations made by

the petitioners and pass appropriate orders within a short period.

7. Considering the above submissions, this Writ Petition is

disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the

counsel, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the

representations made by the petitioners, dated 27.05.2021 and

19.07.2021 as per the rules and pass appropriate orders, taking

pandemic situation into consideration, communicate the same to

the petitioners. Till such time, the respondents shall not take any

coercive steps pursuant to eviction orders, dated 11-02-2021. It is

needles to state that the petitioners also settle the amounts to the

respondent-Corporation in the meanwhile. There shall be no order

as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

also stand closed.

______________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Date: 20.07.2021 Pnr

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO.14236 OF 2021

Date: 20-07-2021

Pnr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter