Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thathireddy Sandhyarani vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2021 Latest Caselaw 273 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 273 AP
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Thathireddy Sandhyarani vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 21 January, 2021
Bench: M.Ganga Rao
              THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO

                    WRIT PETITON NO.1497 of 2021

ORDER:

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, questioning the action of the 4th respondent in refusing to register the document of sale dated 26.12.2020, executed by Parvatham Deepthi, Parvatham Kamal Karishma and Parvatham Bala Kowshik Reddy in favour of the petitioner, presented for registration, the same was kept pending vide document P.No.271/2020, 26.12.2020 and the action of the 3rd respondent in upholding the above said refusal of registration by the 4th respondent in Appeal No.2 of 2020, dated 11.01.2021 as contrary, illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register the document vide P.No.271/2020, dated 26.12.2020 and release the same to the petitioner in respect of an extent of Ac.191.99 sq.yards., situated in Sy.No.471/2 and 472, of Ward No.8 of Kanigiri Nagara Panchayat, Prakasam District."

The main ground urged by this petitioner is that when the

document is presented for registration, rejection of the same based

on the Draft Memo No.G2/19132/2011, dt.01-11-2011 with

District Registrar, Markapuram, Prakasam District, vide

Endorsement No.G1/1382/2011, dt.09-12-2011, is illegal. A copy

of the memo is placed on record by the learned counsel for

petitioner.

The order under challenge is not passed under Section 71 of

the Registration Act, refusal to register a document on the memo

issued by Tahsildar or any other officer is illegal in view of the two

Division Bench judgments in P.Narasimha Reddy v. Sub-

Registrar, Shameerpeta Mandal, Ranga Reddy District1 and

S.Nagi Reddy v. Joint Sub-Registrar, Tirupati2. Therefore, the

order impugned in this Writ Petition is contrary to the law declared

by the Division Bench and also another judgment of Single Judge

in W.P.No.10721 of 2016, dt.01-04-2016, W.P.No.34689 of 2012,

dt.12-12-2012. Hence, the impugned proceedings are hereby set

aside while directing the 4th respondent to register the document

by following the principles laid down in the judgments referred

supra, if no prohibitory order is passed by any competent

authority/Court, in accordance with law.

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of,

without touching the merits in the title of the petitioner. There

shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in

this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO

Date: 21.01.2021 KLPD

2005 (2) ALT 807

1999 (4) ALT 556

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO

WRIT PETITON NO.1497 of 2021

Date: 21-01-2021

KLPD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter