Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 594 AP
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.163 of 2021
ORDER:-
This Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly
one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action
of the 2nd respondent in not taking any steps to delete the
land an extent of Ac. 52.22 Sq.yds, situated in Sy.No. 14/3 of Tiruchanur Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District from the prohibited property list maintained under Section 22(a)(1)(c) of the Registration Act, 1908 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of provisions of Registration Act, 1908 and rules made thereunder and Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. Consequently direct the respondents to delete the land in respect of the land from the prohibited property list."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Assistant Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps
appearing for the respondents.
3. The case of the petitioner is that land an extent of Ac.
52.22 Sq.yds, situated in Sy.No. 14/3 of Tiruchanur Village,
Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District was purchased by the
petitioner from Mabbu Chandrasekhar Reddy, through a Sale Deed
dated 22.06.2007 and presented the same before the 6th
respondent for registration and the same was rejected vide
proceedings P.No.195 of 2007, dated 22.09.2007 on the ground
that the land was included in the prohibited property list
maintained under Section 22-A(1)(c) of the Registration Act, 1908,
aggrieved by the orders, the petitioner has filed an Appeal No. 42 of
2007 before the 3rd respondent under Section 72 of the
Registration Act and same was dismissed. As against that, the
petitioner has filed W.P.No.19620 of 2010, this Court disposed of
the Writ Petition along with batch cases by following the Judgment
of the Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chari's case. Again the 2nd respondent
by following the Judgment of Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chari's case,
has included the land in the prohibited property list maintained
under Section 22-A(1)(c) of the Registration Act, 1908. The
petitioner made representation to the 2nd respondent on
16.10.2020 with a request to delete the land from the prohibited
property list, but the 2nd respondent having received the same, no
steps had been taken for deletion of the land from the prohibited
property list, is illegal and arbitrary. Assailing the arbitrary action
of the 2nd respondent, the writ petition came to be filed.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Assistant Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps
and learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for
respondents.
5. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner's
land is included in the prohibited property list maintained under
Section 22-A(1)(c) of the Registration Act, 1908, based on the letter
dated 05.07.2016 addressed by the Commissioner, Endowments
Department, A.P to the Commissioner and Inspector General,
Stamps and Registration Department, Government of A.P. The land
is private patta land, which included in the prohibited property list
is illegal and arbitrary and filed representation before the
Commissioner, Endowments on 16.10.2020, so far, no action is
taken on the petitioner's representation.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the action of
the 2nd respondent in including the land in the prohibited property
list maintained under Section 22-A(1)(c) of the Registration Act,
1908 and inspite of representation dated 16.10.2020 made by the
petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of
Registration Act.
7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
considering the submissions of the counsel and on perusal of the
record, this court felt it appropriate to dispose of the Writ petition
directing the 2nd respondent to consider the application of the
petitioner submitted on 16.10.2020 for deletion of the land from
the prohibited property list as per law, by following the decision of
the full bench of the combined High Court of Andhra Pradesh at
Hyderabad in the case of Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary Vs. State
of A.P & Others1 as expeditiously as possible within a period of
four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and
communicate the proceedings to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be
no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if
any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
Date: 03.02.2021.
KK
2016(2)-ALD-P.236 = 2016(1) ALT 550 (FB)
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.163 of 2021
Date: 03.02.2021
W
KK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!