Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1126 AP
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.4542 OF 2021
ORDER:
This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, seeking the following relief:
"to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not regulating of pay of the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No.302, Finance and Planning Department, dated 18.07.1990 and difference in pay allowance on restoration of seniority on par with his junior as highly arbitrary, illegal and contrary to rules and consequently direct the respondents to regulate pay of the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No.302, Finance and Planning Department, dated 18.07.1990 and difference in pay allowance of on restoration of seniority on par with his junior and pass such other order or orders".
2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during the course of hearing learned counsel for the
petitioner Mr.M.Kesava Rao, requested this Court without touching
the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to
dispose of the representation dated 06.09.2018 submitted by the
petitioner.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing
for respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representation dated
06.09.2018 submitted by the petitioner, if any pending with the
respondent authorities.
4. In view of the submission of learned Assistant Government
Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondents, I need not decide the
truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition.
5. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued in view
of the judgment of the Apex Court in The Government of India v.
P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may
make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened
adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of
justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to
issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 06.09.2018
submitted by the petitioner, I find no other alternative except to issue
such direction.
6. In the result, Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the
respondent authorities to dispose of representation dated 06.09.2018
submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within four (4)
weeks from today. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 24.02.2021
IS
2019 (8) SCALE 544
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.4542 OF 2021
Date: 24-02-2021
IS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!