Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nallagorla Gangadhara Rao ... vs The State Of Ap
2021 Latest Caselaw 5429 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5429 AP
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Nallagorla Gangadhara Rao ... vs The State Of Ap on 22 December, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

       WRIT PETITION Nos.8311, 8433 and 8686 of 2021

COMMON ORDER:-

      These three Writ Petitions are filed for a mandamus

declaring the action of respondents in not closing the rowdy sheets

that were opened against the petitioners even after the petitioners

were acquitted in the sole crime that was registered against them

as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Standing Order 742 of the A.P.

Police Standing Orders and consequently prayed to set aside the

said rowdy sheets which are opened against the petitioners and

being continued from time to time.

The facts germane to dispose of these Writ Petitions may be

stated as follows:

A case in Crime No.283 of 2019 was registered against the

petitioners under Section 307 r/w 34 IPC by Mangalagiri Town

police. The petitioners are A-1 to A-3 in the said crime. As crime

was registered against them for alleged commission of the offence

of attempting to murder punishable under Section 307 IPC, by

invoking Standing Order 601 of the A.P. Police Standing Orders,

which states that when a charge sheet is filed against any person

for commission of offence of murder or attempt to commit murder,

a rowdy sheet can be opened, three separate rowdy sheets were

opened against these petitioners on the ground that charge sheet

under Section 307 r/w 34 IPC was filed against the petitioners in

the above crime.

After trial of the case, the petitioners were acquitted in the

said crime. However, the said rowdy sheets are being continued

from time to time without closing the same even after the

petitioners were acquitted in the above crime. Therefore, the

present Writ Petitions have been filed seeking the aforesaid relief.

Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents

stating that even though the petitioners were acquitted in the

above crime and even though they are not figured as accused in

previous five years after the last case in which they were involved

ended in acquittal that nothing precludes S.P/D.C.P/C.P to

continue the rowdy sheet if they are of the considered view that

activities of the petitioners are prejudicial to the maintenance of

public order or affecting peace and tranquility in the area or when

the victims are not coming forward to give complaint on them on

account of threat from them. Therefore, invoking Standing Order

602(2) of A.P. Police Standing Orders, it is pleaded that the

respondents are justified in continuing the said rowdy sheets as

the acts of the petitioners are prejudicial to the maintenance of

public order and as victims are not coming forward to give

complaint against them. Therefore, it is prayed to dismiss the Writ

Petitions.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

Admittedly, the rowdy sheets were opened against the

petitioners herein after they were involved in a crime punishable

under Section 307 r/w 34 IPC on the ground that they attempted

to commit murder of the victim in the said crime. The crime was

investigated and charge sheet was filed in the said case. The trial

took place and after full fledged trial, the petitioners herein, who

are A-1 to A-3 in the above crime, were acquitted of the said

offence. The judgment of the acquittal also became final. No other

crime is pending against the petitioners. However, without closing

the rowdy sheet after acquittal of the petitioners in the said case,

the respondents have been continuing the said rowdy sheets

against the petitioners from time to time on the sole ground that

their activities are prejudicial to the maintenance of public order

and that the victims are not coming forward to give complaint

against them. The said rowdy sheets are being continued by

invoking Standing Order 602(2) of the A.P. Police Standing Orders,

which says that when the activities of the rowdy sheeter are

prejudicial to the maintenance of public order and when the

victims are not coming forward to give complaint against them and

even though they are not figuring as accused in the previous five

years after the last case in which they are involved ended in

acquittal, that the same can be continued.

However, except making a bald assertion stating that the

activities of the petitioners are prejudicial to the public order and

that the victims are not coming forward to give any complaint

against them, no material worth the name to substantiate the said

version of the respondents is placed before the Court to justify

their action of continuing rowdy sheets on the aforesaid grounds.

There is absolutely no material on record to substantiate the plea

of the respondents that the petitioners are indulging in any such

activities which are prejudicial to the public order or which are

disturbing the public peace and tranquility or that the victims are

not coming forward to lodge any report against them. So, in the

absence of any such material, the action of the respondents in

continuing the rowdy sheet on mere bald assertion made to that

effect cannot be countenanced. In fact, when a similar plea was

taken by the police in Writ Petition No.24672 of 2020, this Court

has negatived the said contention and held that in the absence of

any material to substantiate the said allegations that the rowdy

sheet cannot be continued.

Therefore, for the aforesaid reasons and in view of the

aforesaid earlier order of this Court in Writ Petition No.24672 of

2020, this Writ Petition is allowed declaring that continuation of

the three rowdy sheets opened against the petitioners even after

their acquittal in the sole crime registered against them as illegal

and unconstitutional. Therefore, the respondents are directed to

forthwith close the rowdy sheets that are opened against the

petitioners.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ Petitions,

shall stand closed.

_____________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

Date: 22.12.2021 AKN

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

WRIT PETITION Nos.8311, 8433 and 8686 of 2021

Date: 22-12-2021

AKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter