Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5007 AP
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.8303 OF 2019
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India seeking the following relief:-
"....to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, Declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to perform Archakatvam in the sanctum sanctorum in 3rd respondent temple by considering the petitioner representations dated 04.04.2019 and 15.04.2019 as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 191g and 25 of Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to perform archakatvam in the sanctum sanctorum of 3rd respondent temple and pass such other order or orders."
Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during hearing, Vijaya Kumar Potturi, learned counsel
for the petitioner limited his request to dispose of the representations
dated 04.04.2019 and 15.04.2019 made by petitioner, without
touching the merits of the case.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing for
respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representations dated
04.04.2019 and 15.04.2019 submitted by the petitioner, if any,
pending with the respondent-authorities.
4. Recording the submissions of the learned Government Pleader
for Endowments, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the
allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no
such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court
in "The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex
Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of
cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not
2019 (8) SCALE 544
serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner
himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the
representations dated 04.04.2019 and 15.04.2019 submitted by the
petitioner, I find no other alternative, except to issue such direction.
5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the
respondents to dispose of the representations dated 04.04.2019 and
15.04.2019 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate order
in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the
date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 07.12.2021
VSL
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.8303 OF 2019
Date: 07.12.2021
VSL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!