Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vandranapu Siva Parvathi, vs The State
2021 Latest Caselaw 3181 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3181 AP
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Vandranapu Siva Parvathi, vs The State on 25 August, 2021

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE NO.: Crl.R.C.No.230 of 2021 PROCEEDING SHEET

Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE No. NOTE

3. 25.08.2021 LK,J Crl.R.C.No.230 of 2021 The criminal revision case is filed assailing the order dated 11.01.2021 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2021 in Crl.Appeal No.1 of 2021 on the file of learned V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada wherein while suspending the sentence imposed in judgment dated 18.12.2020 passed in C.C.No.376 of 2016 on the file of V Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada has imposed a condition of the petitioner depositing 20% of the cheque amount within 60 days from the date of the said order.

I.A.Nos.2 and 3 are filed seeking suspension of order dated 11.01.2021 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2021 in Crl.Appeal No.1 of 2021 and to grant stay on arrest warrant dated 12.03.2021, resepctively.

Ealier this Court by order dated 09.04.2021 has passed the following interim orders in the above said interlocutory applications:

" I.A.No.2 of 2021: There shall be an order of interim suspension of the sentence imposed by the courts below subject to condition that the petitioner depositing 20% of the cheque amount within four weeks from today pending further orders.

I.A.No.3 of 2021: There shall be interim stay as prayed for pending further orders. In default of payment of 20% of the cheque amount, as ordered in I.A.No.2 of 2021, the interim stay granted by this court in this IA is deemed to have been cancelled."

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the numbering of the criminal appeal, the complainant died and steps have to be taken to bring legal heirs of the complainant on record. Learned counsel submits that as per Section 148 of the N.I. Act, appellate Court may direct the appellant to deposit such amount, which shall be a minimum of 20% of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court, but not the cheque amount. He submits that in this case, the trial Court has convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I.Act and sentenced her to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and also to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-. He submits that as no compensation or fine was awarded by the trial Court the appellate Court ought not to have directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the cheque amount.

In view of the language employed under Section 148 of the N.I. Act and to meet the interest of justice, sentence of imprisonment imposed against the petitioner/accused in judgment dated 18.12.2020 passed in C.C.No.376 of 2016 on the file of learned V Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, alone is suspended, pending the criminal revision case, on condition of petitioner surrenderring before learned V Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada and on such surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail on the same day on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of learned V Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

_______ LK, J ikn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter