Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mada Krishnaiah vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2021 Latest Caselaw 3123 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3123 AP
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Mada Krishnaiah vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 23 August, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
    THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                  WRIT PETITION No.17999 OF 2021

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, seeking the following relief:

".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not deleting the petitioners property in an extent of Ac. 2.48 cents in Sy.No.1047/1 of Tallapaka Revenue Village, Rajampet Mandal, Kadapa District from the list of prohibited properties list U/Sec 22-A(1)(a) of Registration Act, as highly arbitrary, illegal, null and void and against norms of public policy and principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental rights apart from Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent authorities to delete the above said property from the list of prohibited properties pursuant to the applications submitted by the petitioners dated 29.11.2018 and 14.02.2019 respectively and the reports of the Tahsildar 12.12.2018 and 16.02.2019 and to effect the registrations in respect of the subject land and pass such other orders...".

2. Though the petitioners made several allegations against the

respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners

limited his request to dispose of the Mee-Seva Applications dated

29.11.2018 and 14.02.2019 submitted by the petitioners, without

touching the merits of the case.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue

appearing for respondents readily agreed to dispose of the Mee-Seva

Applications dated 29.11.2018 and 14.02.2019 submitted by the

petitioners, if any, pending with the respondent authorities.

4. Recording the submissions of the learned Government

Pleader for Revenue, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the

allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such

direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in "The

Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex Court held

that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in

overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But they do not serve to the

cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioners himself

requested to issue a direction to dispose of the Mee Seva Applications

dated 29.11.2018 and 14.02.2019 submitted by the petitioners, I find

no other alternative, except to issue such direction.

5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the

respondent authorities to dispose of the Mee-Seva Applications dated

29.11.2018 and 14.02.2019 submitted by the petitioners, in

accordance with law, within two (02) months from the date of receipt

of a copy of this order. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall

also stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Date: 24.08.2021

KK

2019 (8) SCALE 544

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

WRIT PETITION No.17999 OF 2021

Date: 24.08.2021

KK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter