Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2859 AP
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.15726 OF 2021
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India seeking the following relief:-
"......to issue a writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of 3rd respondent in adjudicating and disposing of the appeal vide Appeal No.3/2007/K filed by the Petitioner against the resumption orders of the 4th Respondent passed under Act 9 of 1997 in relation to the private lands to an extent of Ac.2.74 cents in Sy.No.610/1 of Pedapalakaluru Village, Guntur Mandal and District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, as also violative of Articles of 14, 19(1)(g) and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the Appeal vide Appeal No.3/2007/K expeditiously in accordance with law and to pass such other order."
2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during hearing, Sri P.Rajkumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner limited his request to dispose of the appeal vide Appeal
No.3/2007/K, dated 21.02.2018 pending with the 3rd respondent,
without touching the merits of the case.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the
respondents readily agreed to dispose of the appeal, if any, pending
with the respondent-authorities.
4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government
Pleader for Revenue, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the
allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no
such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court
in The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex
Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of
2019 (8) SCALE 544
cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do no
service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the
petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the
appeal, dated 21.02.2018 pending before the 3rd respondent, I find
no other alternative, except to issue such direction.
5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the
3rd respondent to dispose of the appeal, dated 21.02.2018 pending
before him, in accordance with law, within a month from today.
No costs.
As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
__________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 04.08.2021
IS
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.15726 OF 2021
Date: 04.08.2021
IS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!