Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M Krishnamurthy vs The State Of Ap
2021 Latest Caselaw 2852 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2852 AP
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
M Krishnamurthy vs The State Of Ap on 4 August, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                    WRIT PETITION NO.15797 OF 2021

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

"....to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the

nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the

Respondent Nos.2 to 4 authorities to delete the petitioner property

lands from the prohibited list of 4 th respondent in Sy.N.1-4 for an

extent of Ac.4.00 cents in Sy.No.1-4 Tummulakonda

Ramachandrapuram Village, Meliaputti Mandal, Srikakulam District

by disposing the petitioner online application vide

No.TATTA012000047751 dated 07.02.2020 is illegal, arbitrary and

violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and

violation of Section 22(A) of Stamps and Registration Act and also

violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct

Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to dispose of the petitioner online application

vide No.TATTA012000047751 dated 07.02.2020"

2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during hearing, Sri T.Tejeswara Rao, learned counsel

for the petitioner limited his request to dispose of the Mee Seva

Application No. TATTA012000047751 dated 07.02.2020

submitted by the petitioner, without touching the merits of the

case.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue

appearing for respondents readily agreed to dispose of the Mee

Seva Application No. TATTA012000047751 dated 07.02.2020

submitted by the petitioner, if any, pending with the respondent-

authorities.

4. Recording the submissions of the learned Government

Pleader for Revenue, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of

the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that

no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex

Court in "The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein

the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or

easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions.

But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned

counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to

dispose of the Mee Seva Application No TATTA012000047751

dated 07.02.2020 submitted by the petitioner, I find no other

alternative, except to issue such direction.

5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the

respondent authorities to dispose of the Mee Seva Application No.

TATTA012000047751 dated 07.02.2020 submitted by the

petitioner, in accordance with law, within two (02) months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous application, pending, if any,

shall also stand closed.

JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Date: 04.08.2021

tm

2019 (8) SCALE 544

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

WRIT PETITION NO.15797 OF 2021

Date: 04.08.2021

tm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter