Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 491 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC-LKO:20724
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1101 of 2026
Anil And 6 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lko. Thru. Chairman And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)
:
Rajesh Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s)
:
C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel.
2. The counsel for the petitioner confines his argument to the effect that the revision preferred by the petitioner may be decided within the time bound manner.
3. Considering the fact that the matter has already been heard, the present petition is disposed off with direction to the opposite party no.1 to decide the revision No.4263 of 2025 (Anil Kumar and others vs. Saltanat Fatima and others) with all expedition preferably within a period of four months.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
March 23, 2026
VNP/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!