Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thakur Shri Gopal Ji Maharaj And Thakur ... vs Smt. Gudiya Yadav And 4 Others
2026 Latest Caselaw 351 ALL

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 351 ALL
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Thakur Shri Gopal Ji Maharaj And Thakur ... vs Smt. Gudiya Yadav And 4 Others on 10 March, 2026

Author: Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
Bench: Yogendra Kumar Srivastava




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC:48374
 
 
 
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
 
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2964 of 2026   
 
   Thakur Shri Gopal Ji Maharaj And Thakur Shri Radha Pulin Bihari Ji Maharaj Virajmaan Temple And 2 Others    
 
  .....Petitioner(s)   
 
 Versus  
 
   Smt. Gudiya Yadav And 4 Others    
 
  .....Respondent(s)       
 
   
 
  
 
Counsel for Petitioner(s)   
 
:   
 
Pranav Mishra, Shivangi Nanda, Tanushri Agarwal   
 
  
 
Counsel for Respondent(s)   
 
:   
 
 
 
   
 
     
 
 Court No. - 35
 
   
 
 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.     

Heard Ms. Shivangi Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to decide the SCC Revision No. 52 of 2024 (Smt. Gudiya Yadav and others vs. Thakur Sri Gopal Ji Maharaj and others), within a stipulated time period.

The petitioner is stated to be the respondent in the revision.

Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the petition to point out that despite several dates having been fixed the case has been adjourned for some reason or other, and the delay in disposal of the revision is stated to be causing hardship to the petitioner.

Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to conclude the proceedings at an early date.

Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court concerned would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid revision, which is stated to be pending before it, preferably within a period of six months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment.

(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)

March 10, 2026

Imroz

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter