Allahabad High Court
Shri Parshuram Giri vs State Of U.P. & 5 Others on 14 October, 2025
Author: Salil Kumar Rai
Bench: Salil Kumar Rai
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:183377-DB
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22541 of 2025
Shri Parshuram Giri
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. & 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)
:
Aqueel Ahmad, Virendra Gupta
Counsel for Respondent(s)
:
G.A.
Court No. - 43
HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. The present petition has been filed praying for the following relief:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct the respondent no. 2 to supervise the investigation of the case crime no. 301 of 2023, under section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S.-Nawabganj, District-Allahabad (Prayagraj) and ensure the fair and impartial investigation accordance with law within stipulated period without any undue delay, otherwise petitioner shall suffer an irreparable loss and injury.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct the respondent no. 2 & 4 to furnish the progress report forthwith regarding the conduct of investigation in case crime No. 301 of 2023, under section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S.-Nawabganj, District-Allahabad (Prayagraj) and to ensure the arrest of wanted all accused person, during the pendency of the instant writ petition before this Hon'ble Court, otherwise petitioner shall suffer an irreparable loss and injury ."
In Paragraph nos. 15 to 17 of its judgment in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2008) 2 SCC 409, the Supreme Court has observed as follows : -
"15. Section 156(3) provides for a check by the Magistrate on the police performing its duties under Chapter XII Cr.P.C. In cases where the Magistrate finds that the police has not done its duty of investigating the case at all, or has not done it satisfactorily, he can issue a direction to the police to do the investigation properly, and can monitor the same.
16. The power in the Magistrate to order further investigation under Section 156(3) is an independent power, and does not affect the power of the investigating officer to further investigate the case even after submission of his report vide Section 173(8). Hence the Magistrate can order re-opening of the investigation even after the police submits the final report, vide State of Bihar vs. J.A.C. Saldanha (SCC : AIR para 19).
17. In our opinion Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is wide enough to include all such powers in a Magistrate which are necessary for ensuring a proper investigation, and it includes the power to order registration of an F.I.R. and of ordering a proper investigation if the Magistrate is satisfied that a proper investigation has not been done, or is not being done by the police. Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., though briefly worded, in our opinion, is very wide and it will include all such incidental powers as are necessary for ensuring a proper investigation."
The provisions in B.N.S.S., 2023 which corresponds to Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. is Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S. In case, the petitioner has any grievance against the manner in which the investigation is being conducted, the petitioner has the remedy to approach the concerned Magistrate under Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S. / Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.
It is not a case for interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, at this stage.
The writ petition is dismissed.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.)
October 14, 2025
Anurag/-
